• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于急救医护人员对临终关怀需求患者识别情况的全国性调查。

A national survey of ambulance paramedics on the identification of patients with end of life care needs.

作者信息

Eaton-Williams Peter, Barrett Jack, Mortimer Craig, Williams Julia

机构信息

South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5664-3329.

South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-537X.

出版信息

Br Paramed J. 2020 Dec 1;5(3):8-14. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2020.12.5.3.8.

DOI:10.29045/14784726.2020.12.5.3.8
PMID:33456392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7783960/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Developing the proactive identification of patients with end of life care (EoLC) needs within ambulance paramedic clinical practice may improve access to care for patients not benefitting from EoLC services at present. To inform development of this role, this study aims to assess whether ambulance paramedics currently identify EoLC patients, are aware of identification guidance and believe this role is appropriate for their practice.

METHODS

Between 4 November 2019 and 5 January 2020, registered paramedics from nine English NHS ambulance service trusts were invited to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire initially explored current practice and awareness, employing multiple-choice questions. The Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSF PIG) was then presented as an example of EoLC assessment guidance, and further questions, permitting free-text responses, explored attitudes towards performing this role.

RESULTS

1643 questionnaires were analysed. Most participants (79.9%; n = 1313) perceived that they attended a patient who was unrecognised as within the last year of life on at least a monthly basis. Despite 72.0% (n = 1183) of paramedics indicating that they had previously made an EoLC referral to a General Practitioner, only 30.5% (n = 501) were familiar with the GSF PIG and of those only 25.9% (n = 130) had received training in its use. Participants overwhelmingly believed that they could (94.4%; n = 1551) and should (97.0%; n = 1594) perform this role, yet current barriers were identified as the inaccessibility of a patient's medical records, inadequate EoLC education and communication difficulties. Consequently, facilitators to performing this role were identified as the provision of training in EoLC assessment guidance and establishing accessible, responsive EoLC referral pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

Provision of EoLC assessment training and dedicated EoLC referral pathways should facilitate ambulance paramedics' roles in the timely recognition of EoLC patients, potentially addressing current inequalities in access to EoLC.

摘要

目标

在救护车护理人员的临床实践中积极识别有临终关怀(EoLC)需求的患者,可能会改善目前无法从EoLC服务中受益的患者获得护理的机会。为了为这一角色的发展提供信息,本研究旨在评估救护车护理人员目前是否能识别EoLC患者,是否了解识别指南,并认为这一角色适合他们的实践。

方法

在2019年11月4日至2020年1月5日期间,邀请了来自英国国民保健服务(NHS)九个救护车服务信托机构的注册护理人员完成一份在线问卷。问卷最初通过多项选择题探索了当前的实践和认知情况。然后,作为EoLC评估指南的一个例子,展示了金标准框架主动识别指南(GSF PIG),并通过允许自由文本回答的进一步问题,探索了对履行这一角色的态度。

结果

分析了1643份问卷。大多数参与者(79.9%;n = 1313)认为他们每月至少会接诊一名未被识别为处于生命最后一年的患者。尽管72.0%(n = 1183)的护理人员表示他们之前曾将EoLC患者转诊给全科医生,但只有30.5%(n = 501)熟悉GSF PIG,其中只有25.9%(n = 130)接受过使用该指南的培训。参与者绝大多数认为他们能够(94.4%;n = 1551)且应该(97.0%;n = 1594)履行这一角色,但目前的障碍被确定为患者病历难以获取、EoLC教育不足以及沟通困难。因此,可以促进履行这一角色的因素被确定为提供EoLC评估指南培训以及建立可及、响应迅速的EoLC转诊途径。

结论

提供EoLC评估培训和专门的EoLC转诊途径应有助于救护车护理人员及时识别EoLC患者的角色,有可能解决目前在获得EoLC方面的不平等问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca9/7783960/b538d41e1f28/BPJ-5-3-8-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca9/7783960/52fc7d4b950d/BPJ-5-3-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca9/7783960/c83f79352b89/BPJ-5-3-8-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca9/7783960/b538d41e1f28/BPJ-5-3-8-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca9/7783960/52fc7d4b950d/BPJ-5-3-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca9/7783960/c83f79352b89/BPJ-5-3-8-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca9/7783960/b538d41e1f28/BPJ-5-3-8-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A national survey of ambulance paramedics on the identification of patients with end of life care needs.一项关于急救医护人员对临终关怀需求患者识别情况的全国性调查。
Br Paramed J. 2020 Dec 1;5(3):8-14. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2020.12.5.3.8.
2
A national survey of ambulance paramedics on the identification of patients with end of life care needs.一项关于急救护理人员对临终关怀需求患者识别情况的全国性调查。
Br Paramed J. 2021 Mar 1;5(4):60-61. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2021.3.5.4.60.
3
Paramedics providing end-of-life care: an online survey of practice and experiences.提供临终护理的护理人员:一项关于实践与经验的在线调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 21;23(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01629-7.
4
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedics working in general practice: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.护理人员在全科医疗中的临床效果及成本效益:一项混合方法的现实主义评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(6):1-137. doi: 10.3310/GTJJ3104.
5
Improving paramedic responses for patients dying at home: a theory of change-based approach.改善在患者家中死亡的急救人员反应:基于变革理论的方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00848-0.
6
GPs' perspective on End-of-Life Care - an evaluation based on the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index.全科医生对临终关怀的看法 - 基于一般实践临终关怀指数德国版的评估。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Nov 16;18:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/000286. eCollection 2020.
7
Paramedic perceptions of barriers and facilitators to the use of ambulance service appropriate care-referral pathways in Northern Ireland: a qualitative study.护理人员对北爱尔兰使用救护车服务适当护理转诊途径的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
Br Paramed J. 2024 Dec 1;9(3):13-20. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.12.9.3.13.
8
Providing medicines in emergency and urgent care: a survey of specialist paramedics' experiences of medication supply and views on paramedic independent prescribing.在急诊和紧急护理中提供药品:对专科护理人员药品供应经验及护理人员独立处方观点的调查
Br Paramed J. 2018 Dec 1;3(3):1-9. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2018.12.3.3.1.
9
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate.跌倒紧急转诊的支持与评估(SAFER)2:一项整群随机试验以及对新协议临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价,该协议用于紧急救护医护人员评估跌倒后的老年人,并在适当时转诊至社区护理。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(13):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta21130.
10
Organisation and management of multi-professional care for cancer patients at end-of-life: state-of-the-art from a survey to community and hospital-based professionals.癌症患者临终多专业护理的组织与管理:针对社区及医院专业人员的一项调查所得的最新情况
Res Health Serv Reg. 2024 Oct 9;3(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s43999-024-00051-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating emergency medical services and palliative care: A nominal group technique.整合紧急医疗服务与姑息治疗:一种名义群体技术。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025 Jun 24;17(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4891.
2
Paramedics providing end-of-life care: an online survey of practice and experiences.提供临终护理的护理人员:一项关于实践与经验的在线调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 21;23(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01629-7.
3
Emergency medical services and palliative care: a scoping review.紧急医疗服务与姑息治疗:范围综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Hospice care access inequalities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.临终关怀服务可及性不平等:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Jun;12(2):142-151. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002719. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Barriers to GPs identifying patients at the end-of-life and discussions about their care: a qualitative study.全科医生识别终末期患者及其护理讨论的障碍:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):639-643. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy135.
3
How many people will need palliative care in 2040? Past trends, future projections and implications for services.
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 16;13(3):e071116. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071116.
2040年将有多少人需要姑息治疗?过去的趋势、未来的预测以及对服务的影响。
BMC Med. 2017 May 18;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0860-2.
4
Why do patients with 'primary care sensitive' problems access ambulance services? A systematic mapping review of the literature.为何患有“初级保健敏感”问题的患者会使用救护车服务?对相关文献的系统映射综述。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 19;5(5):e007726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007726.
5
Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.内容分析和主题分析:对开展定性描述性研究的启示。
Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048. Epub 2013 Mar 11.