Goldman Taylor, Burjonrappa Sathyaprasad
Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Florida, USA.
Rutgers State University of New Jersey, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Place, MEB 504, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901 New Jersey, USA.
Int J Pediatr. 2020 Dec 29;2020:6621992. doi: 10.1155/2020/6621992. eCollection 2020.
Pediatric nonaccidental trauma (NAT) is difficult to diagnose. Several isolated injuries in NAT could happen in the setting of accidental trauma (AT), and having a high index of suspicion is important to correctly identify abuse. NAT has a significant mortality rate if the sentinel event is not adequately diagnosed, and the infant is not separated from the perpetrator. Level 1 pediatric trauma centers (PTC) see a significant number of NAT. We evaluated the injury patterns of NAT admissions at our level 1 PTC.
Retrospective analysis of all cases of NAT for children under the age of two admitted at an ACS level 1 pediatric trauma center between the years of 2016 and 2018. Charts were queried for demographic data, injury patterns, mortality, and disposition. Correlation between disposition status and injury patterns was performed. The Fisher Exact test and student -test were used to study the significance of differences in categorical and continuous data, respectively.
32/91 (35%) trauma patients under the age of two years were diagnosed as NAT in the three-year study period. 21/32 (39%) male and 11/26 (42%) female admissions were confirmed NAT ( = NS). 20 were under 1 year of age, and 12 were aged between 1 and 2 years ( = NS). 13 (41%) were Caucasian, 6 (19%) were Hispanic/Latino, 11 (34%) were Black, and 2(6%) were of unknown ethnicity ( = NS). Facial, torso, lower extremity, retinal, and internal organ injury were significantly more common with NAT. Medicaid coverage was noted in 31/32 (97%) NAT patients. 20/32 (62.5%) patients were legally displaced as a result of the NAT.
1/3 of all admissions at a pediatric level 1 trauma center were identified as NAT. A high index of suspicion is necessary to not miss NAT, as injury patterns are variable. Nearly 1/3 of all victims go back to the same environment where they sustained NAT increasing their susceptibility to future NAT.
儿童非意外创伤(NAT)难以诊断。NAT中的几种孤立性损伤可能发生在意外创伤(AT)情况下,因此保持高度怀疑指数对于正确识别虐待行为很重要。如果未能充分诊断出哨兵事件且婴儿未与施虐者隔离,NAT会有显著的死亡率。一级儿科创伤中心(PTC)会接诊大量NAT病例。我们评估了我们一级PTC中NAT入院患者的损伤模式。
对2016年至2018年间在一家美国外科医师学会一级儿科创伤中心收治的所有2岁以下儿童NAT病例进行回顾性分析。查询病历以获取人口统计学数据、损伤模式、死亡率和处置情况。对处置状态与损伤模式之间的相关性进行分析。分别使用Fisher精确检验和学生t检验来研究分类数据和连续数据差异的显著性。
在为期三年的研究期间,91名2岁以下创伤患者中有32例(35%)被诊断为NAT。确诊为NAT的男性入院患者有21/32例(39%),女性有11/26例(42%)(p = 无显著性差异)。20例患者年龄在1岁以下,12例年龄在1至2岁之间(p = 无显著性差异)。13例(41%)为白种人,6例(19%)为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,11例(34%)为黑人,2例(6%)种族不明(p = 无显著性差异)。面部、躯干、下肢、视网膜和内脏损伤在NAT中明显更为常见。32例NAT患者中有31例(97%)有医疗补助覆盖。20/32例(62.5%)患者因NAT而被合法转移安置。
一级儿科创伤中心所有入院患者中有三分之一被确定为NAT。由于损伤模式多变,保持高度怀疑指数对于不遗漏NAT很有必要。几乎所有受害者中有三分之一回到了他们遭受NAT的相同环境,这增加了他们未来遭受NAT的易感性。