• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"If at Least the Patient Could Not Be Forgotten About": Communication in the Emergency Department as a Predictor of Patient Satisfaction.“哪怕只是别把患者忘掉就好”:急诊科的沟通情况作为患者满意度的一项预测指标
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1015-1021. doi: 10.1177/2374373520957123. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Optimizing patient/caregiver satisfaction through quality of communication in the pediatric emergency department.通过改善儿科急诊科的沟通质量来优化患者/护理人员满意度。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1016-21. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235be06.
3
Lack of association between Press Ganey emergency department patient satisfaction scores and emergency department administration of analgesic medications.Press Ganey急诊患者满意度评分与急诊镇痛药物管理之间缺乏相关性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;64(5):469-81. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
4
The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients.急诊科拥挤对住院患者满意度的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;15(9):825-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00200.x.
5
The impact of patient telephone call after discharge on likelihood to recommend in an academic emergency department.出院后患者电话随访对学术型急诊科患者推荐意愿的影响
J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.11.067. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
6
Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital.患者对一所学术教学医院急诊科服务的满意度。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Apr;10(4):1718-1725. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_8_20. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
The Impact of Medical Student Participation in Emergency Medicine Patient Care on Departmental Press Ganey Scores.医学生参与急诊医学患者护理对科室Press Ganey评分的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):830-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27321. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
8
Effect of an emergency department fast track on Press-Ganey patient satisfaction scores.急诊科快速通道对Press-Ganey患者满意度评分的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):34-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.11.21768. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
9
Emergency department visits after lumbar spine surgery are associated with lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores.腰椎手术后急诊就诊与较低的医疗机构患者评估系统评分相关。
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.043. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
10
Provider interruptions and patient perceptions of care: an observational study in the emergency department.医务人员打断患者叙述和患者对医疗服务的感知:一项在急诊科的观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):296-304. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007811. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulated Patient Experience Workshop as a Model for Feedback and Continuous Improvement in Practicing Physicians.模拟患者体验工作坊作为执业医师反馈与持续改进的模式
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jun 30;12:23743735251342122. doi: 10.1177/23743735251342122. eCollection 2025.
2
Patients' experiences of attending emergency departments where primary care services are located: qualitative findings from patient and clinician interviews from a realist evaluation.患者在设有基层医疗服务的急诊部门的就诊体验:一项实际评估中来自患者和临床医生访谈的定性发现。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00562-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Centered Communication Behaviors That Correlate With Higher Patient Satisfaction Scores.与更高患者满意度评分相关的以患者为中心的沟通行为。
J Patient Exp. 2018 Sep;5(3):231-235. doi: 10.1177/2374373517750414. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
2
Is hallway care dangerous? An observational study.走廊护理是否存在危险?一项观察性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;36(8):1451-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
The Patient Experience: Informing Practice through Identification of Meaningful Communication from the Patient's Perspective.患者体验:从患者角度识别有意义的沟通以指导实践。
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Mar 20;6(1):26. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6010026.
4
Shared Decision Making in Neurocritical Care.神经重症监护中的共同决策制定
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018 Apr;29(2):315-321. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.11.009.
5
Introduction of a Surgical Navigator in the Perioperative Process Improves Patient Satisfaction.在围手术期过程中引入手术导航仪可提高患者满意度。
J Patient Exp. 2017 Mar;4(1):10-16. doi: 10.1177/2374373517692916. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
Developing effective and caring nurse-patient relationships.建立有效的、关怀备至的护患关系。
Nurs Stand. 2017 Mar 8;31(28):54-63. doi: 10.7748/ns.2017.e10735.
7
Shared decision making in the ED: ethical considerations.急诊科的共同决策:伦理考量
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;34(8):1668-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.05.058. Epub 2016 May 24.
8
Hallway Patients Reduce Overall Emergency Department Satisfaction.在走廊候诊的患者会降低急诊科的整体满意度。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.05.002. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
9
From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.从三重目标到四重目标:照顾患者需要照顾医疗服务提供者。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.
10
Understanding the patients' perspective of emotional support to significantly improve overall patient satisfaction.了解患者对情感支持的看法,以显著提高患者的总体满意度。
Healthc Q. 2012;15(4):63-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.23193.

“哪怕只是别把患者忘掉就好”:急诊科的沟通情况作为患者满意度的一项预测指标

"If at Least the Patient Could Not Be Forgotten About": Communication in the Emergency Department as a Predictor of Patient Satisfaction.

作者信息

Villalona Seiichi, Boxtha Carol, Webb W Alex, Cervantes Cirenio, Wilson Jason W

机构信息

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1015-1021. doi: 10.1177/2374373520957123. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520957123
PMID:33457540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786656/
Abstract

Press Ganey survey data are used by institutions to understand patient experiences in the emergency department (ED). The present mixed-methods retrospective cohort study examined the effects of hallway placement, pain management reporting, communication approaches, time spent in the ED, and other demographic variables on predicting satisfaction ratings of doctors, nurses, and overall ED care. A total of 4940 patient responses between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, were analyzed from 2 EDs associated with an academic institution and tertiary care center. Consensus coding was used to qualitatively capture patient responses that relate to communication issues pertaining to care/empathy and understandings of ED procedures. After controlling for multiple factors, hallway placement, pain management, and understanding of ED procedures were associated with higher odds of negative ratings for doctors, nurses, and overall assessment. Issues with patient communication, particularly regarding understanding of ED procedures, were found to be a strong predictor of negative ratings of doctors, nurses, and overall care. These findings point to the improvements in communication as a potential point of intervention in mitigating negative patient experiences.

摘要

医疗机构使用Press Ganey调查数据来了解患者在急诊科(ED)的体验。本混合方法回顾性队列研究考察了在走廊安置、疼痛管理报告、沟通方式、在急诊科的停留时间以及其他人口统计学变量对预测患者对医生、护士及整体急诊科护理满意度评级方面的影响。对2012年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间来自一所学术机构和三级护理中心附属的两家急诊科的共4940份患者回复进行了分析。采用共识编码定性获取与护理/同理心相关的沟通问题以及对急诊科程序理解方面的患者回复。在控制了多个因素后,走廊安置、疼痛管理以及对急诊科程序的理解与对医生、护士及整体评估的负面评级几率较高相关。发现患者沟通问题,尤其是在对急诊科程序理解方面的问题,是对医生、护士及整体护理负面评级的有力预测因素。这些发现表明改善沟通是减轻负面患者体验的一个潜在干预点。