Gao Catherine A, Howard Frederick M, Siner Jonathan M, Candido Thomas D, Ferrante Lauren E
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jan 8;3(1):e0325. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000325. eCollection 2021 Jan.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate trends in set tidal volumes across all adult ICUs at a large academic medical center over 6 years, with a focus on adherence to lung-protective ventilation (≤ 8-cc/kg ideal body weight). A secondary objective was to survey providers on their perceptions of lung-protective ventilation and barriers to its implementation.
Retrospective observational analysis (primary objective) and cross-sectional survey study (secondary objective), both at a single center.
Mechanically ventilated adult patients with a set tidal volume (primary objective) and providers rotating through the Medical and Neurosciences ICUs (secondary objective).
None.
From 2013 to 2018, the average initial set tidal volume (cc/kg ideal body weight) decreased from 8.99 ± 2.19 to 7.45±1.34 ( < 0.001). The cardiothoracic ICU had the largest change in tidal volume from 11.09 ± 1.96 in 2013 to 7.97 ± 1.03 in 2018 ( < 0.001). Although the majority of tidal volumes across all ICUs were between 6.58 and 8.01 (interquartile range) in 2018, 27% of patients were still being ventilated at volumes greater than 8-cc/kg ideal body weight. Most surveyed respondents felt there was benefit to lung-protective ventilation, though many did not routinely calculate the set tidal volume in cc/kg ideal body weight, and most did not feel it was easily calculable with the current electronic medical record system.
Despite a trend toward lower tidal volumes over the years, in 2018, over a quarter of mechanically ventilated adult patients were being ventilated with tidal volumes greater than 8 cc/kg. Survey data indicate that despite respondents acknowledging the benefits of lung-protective ventilation, there are barriers to its optimal implementation. Future modifications of the electronic medical record, including a calculator to set tidal volume in cc/kg and the use of default set tidal volumes, may help facilitate the delivery of and adherence to lung-protective ventilation.
本研究的主要目的是评估一家大型学术医疗中心所有成人重症监护病房(ICU)在6年期间设定潮气量的趋势,重点是肺保护性通气(≤8 cc/千克理想体重)的依从性。次要目的是调查医护人员对肺保护性通气的看法及其实施障碍。
单中心的回顾性观察分析(主要目的)和横断面调查研究(次要目的)。
设定了潮气量的机械通气成年患者(主要目的)以及在医学和神经科学ICU轮转的医护人员(次要目的)。
无。
2013年至2018年,平均初始设定潮气量(cc/千克理想体重)从8.99±2.19降至7.45±1.34(P<0.001)。心胸外科ICU的潮气量变化最大,从2013年的11.09±1.96降至2018年的7.97±1.03(P<0.001)。尽管2018年所有ICU的大多数潮气量在6.58至8.01之间(四分位间距),但仍有27%的患者接受大于8 cc/千克理想体重的通气。大多数接受调查的受访者认为肺保护性通气有益,尽管许多人没有常规计算以cc/千克理想体重为单位的设定潮气量,并且大多数人认为使用当前的电子病历系统不容易计算。
尽管多年来潮气量有降低趋势,但在2018年,超过四分之一的机械通气成年患者接受的潮气量大于8 cc/千克。调查数据表明,尽管受访者承认肺保护性通气的益处,但其最佳实施仍存在障碍。电子病历的未来改进,包括用于设定以cc/千克为单位潮气量的计算器以及使用默认设定潮气量,可能有助于促进肺保护性通气的实施和依从性。