Suppr超能文献

沙库巴曲缬沙坦的安全性和耐受性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Safety and tolerability of sacubitril-valsartan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa. Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal.

Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa. Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 May;20(5):577-588. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1877658. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Abstract

: Sacubitril-valsartan is a recently approved drug. However, there are few data regarding safety issues. We aimed to summarize the available evidence regarding sacubitril-valsartan's safety and tolerability.: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling patients receiving sacubitril-valsartan for any condition, compared with standard therapy or placebo. Database search was performed in October 2019. Outcomes were adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), discontinuation due to AEs, and five AEs of special interest. Data were reported using risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI).: We included 20 RCTs (22510 participants). When compared with active controls, there were no differences in SAEs (RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.86-1.01) and AEs (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.97-1.03). However, sacubitril-valsartan resulted in an 8% risk reduction in discontinuation due to AEs (95%CI 0.85-0.99) and an increased risk of hypotension (RR=1.45, 95%CI 1.27-1.67). The risk of angioedema was higher with follow-ups greater than 12 months (RR=2.36, 95%CI 1.29-4.33). There were no further significant differences in the remaining AEs' risk.: Sacubitril-valsartan was at least as safe and tolerable as active control, with a similar need of administration cautiousness, except for a higher risk of hypotension. However, one should consider the study's limitations.

摘要

: 沙库巴曲缬沙坦是一种最近批准的药物。然而,关于安全性问题的数据很少。我们旨在总结关于沙库巴曲缬沙坦安全性和耐受性的现有证据。: 我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入了接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗任何疾病的随机对照试验(RCT),并与标准治疗或安慰剂进行比较。数据库检索于 2019 年 10 月进行。结局指标为不良事件(AE)、严重不良事件(SAE)、因 AE 停药以及 5 种特别关注的 AE。数据采用风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)报告。: 我们纳入了 20 项 RCT(22510 名参与者)。与活性对照相比,SAE(RR=0.93,95%CI 0.86-1.01)和 AE(RR=1.00,95%CI 0.97-1.03)无差异。然而,沙库巴曲缬沙坦导致因 AE 停药的风险降低了 8%(95%CI 0.85-0.99),且低血压的风险增加(RR=1.45,95%CI 1.27-1.67)。随访时间大于 12 个月时,发生血管性水肿的风险更高(RR=2.36,95%CI 1.29-4.33)。其余 AE 风险无显著差异。: 沙库巴曲缬沙坦与活性对照一样安全且耐受,除了低血压风险较高外,需要谨慎管理药物。然而,应考虑到研究的局限性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验