2D shear wave elastography is better than transient elastography in predicting post-hepatectomy complication after resection.

OBJECTIVES

Both transient elastography (TE) and 2D shear wave elastography (SWE) are accurate methods to evaluate liver fibrosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 2D-SWE in predicting post-hepatectomy complication and to compare it with TE.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 125 patients with liver tumors. Liver stiffness (LS) (kilopascal [kPa]) was measured using both TE and 2D-SWE before surgery. All post-operative complication was evaluated using the comprehensive complication index (CCI), and CCI ≥ 26.2 was defined as severe complication. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for severe complication. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TE/2D-SWE in detecting liver fibrosis and severe complication.

RESULTS

Severe complication developed in 18 patients. The median LS in patients with severe complication was significantly higher for both 2D-SWE (11.4 kPa vs. 7.0 kPa, p < 0.001) and TE (8.9 kPa vs. 6.2 kPa, p = 0.009). LS obtained from 2D-SWE was a significant factor correlated with severe complication (odds ratio: 1.27 per kPa [1.10-1.46], p = 0.001). The diagnostic performance of 2D-SWE was significantly higher than that of TE in detecting both ≥F3 (p = 0.024) and F4 (p = 0.048). The area under the curve of 2D-SWE to predict severe complication was 0.854, significantly higher than 0.692 of TE (p = 0.004). The optimal cut-off LS from 2D-SWE to predict severe complication was 8.6 kPa, with sensitivity of 88.9% (16/18) and specificity of 73.8% (79/107).

CONCLUSION

LS obtained from 2D-SWE was a significant predictive factor for severe complication, and 2D-SWE showed significantly a better diagnostic performance than TE in detecting liver fibrosis and severe complication.

KEY POINTS

• The diagnostic performance of 2D-SWE was significantly higher than that of TE in detecting both ≥ F3 (AUC: 0.853 vs. 0.779, p = 0.024) and F4 (AUC: 0.929 vs. 0.872, p = 0.048). • Liver stiffness value obtained from 2D-SWE was a significant factor correlated with the development of severe complication defined as CCI ≥ 26.2 after hepatic resection for liver tumors (odds ratio: 1.27 per kPa [1.10-1.46], p = 0.001). • 2D-SWE provided significantly a better diagnostic performance in predicting severe complication after hepatic resection than TE (AUC for 2D-SWE: 0.853 vs. AUC for TE: 0.692, p = 0.004).