Sebayang Susy Katikana, Dewi Desak Made Sintha Kurnia, Puspikawati Septa Indra, Astutik Erni, Melaniani Soenarnatalina, Kusuma Dian
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Banyuwangi Campus, Banyuwangi, Indonesia.
Research Group for Health and Wellbeing of Women and Children, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Banyuwangi Campus, Banyuwangi, Indonesia.
Glob Public Health. 2022 Mar;17(3):420-430. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1869800. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
There is a major gap of action by the Indonesian government to control tobacco advertisement. This study aimed to compare outdoor tobacco advertisements (OTAs) in locations with and without OTA bans in relation to their proximity to children and adolescents. Global positioning system coordinates of all OTAs visible from the streets in Banyuwangi and Surabaya in East Java province were collected and analysed to determine their density at 0-100, >100-300 and >300-500 m from facilities used by children and adolescents. Hotspot analysis was conducted to identify places with exceptionally high densities of OTAs. The number and density of OTAs in Surabaya, where there was no policy for controlling OTAs, were greater than those in Banyuwangi, where OTAs were partially banned. Regardless of the existence of a ban, OTAs were 2.6-3.4 times denser in areas closer to facilities used by children and adolescents than further apart. The OTA point hotspots approximated the hotspots of tobacco retailers and facilities used by children and adolescents in both locations. A partial ban may only have a small impact. A total advertising ban, including at point of sale, should be encouraged for both locations for optimal protection of children and adolescents.
印度尼西亚政府在控制烟草广告方面存在重大行动差距。本研究旨在比较有和没有禁止户外烟草广告(OTA)的地区的户外烟草广告,看其与儿童和青少年活动场所的距离情况。收集并分析了东爪哇省班尤旺吉和泗水市街道上可见的所有OTA的全球定位系统坐标,以确定它们在距离儿童和青少年使用的设施0至100米、大于100至300米和大于300至500米处的密度。进行热点分析以确定OTA密度异常高的地点。在没有控制OTA政策的泗水市,OTA的数量和密度高于部分禁止OTA的班尤旺吉。无论是否有禁令,靠近儿童和青少年使用设施的地区的OTA密度比远离这些设施的地区高2.6至3.4倍。两个地点的OTA点热点都与烟草零售商以及儿童和青少年使用的设施的热点相近。部分禁令可能只会产生很小的影响。为了对儿童和青少年提供最佳保护,应鼓励在这两个地点全面禁止广告,包括在销售点的广告。