Suppr超能文献

早产儿预防性补充益生菌——非随机研究的系统评价与荟萃分析

Prophylactic Probiotic Supplementation for Preterm Neonates-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonrandomized Studies.

作者信息

Deshmukh Mangesh, Patole Sanjay

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.

Department of Neonatology, St. John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.

出版信息

Adv Nutr. 2021 Jul 30;12(4):1411-1423. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa164.

Abstract

Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that probiotics reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC ≥ Stage II), late onset sepsis (LOS), all-cause mortality, and feeding intolerance in preterm neonates. Data from observational studies is important to confirm probiotic effects in clinical practice. We aimed to compare outcomes before and after implementing routine probiotic supplementation (RPS) in preterm neonates (<37 weeks of gestation) by performing a systematic review of non-RCTs using Cochrane methodology. Databases including PubMed, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Central library, and Google Scholar were searched in May 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Categorical measure of effect size was expressed as OR and 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-squared test, I2 statistic. The level of evidence (LOE) was summarized using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) guidelines. Primary outcomes were NEC ≥ Stage II, LOS, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included probiotic sepsis. Thirty good-quality non-RCTs (n = 77,018) from 18 countries were included. The meta-analysis showed RPS was associated with significantly reduced: 1) NEC ≥ Stage II (30 studies, n = 77,018; OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.73; P <0.00001, I2: 65%; LOE: Moderate), 2) LOS: (21 studies, n = 65,858; OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.97; P = 0.02, I2: 74%; LOE: Low), and 3) all-cause mortality (27 non-RCTs, n = 70,977; OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.88; P = 0.0001, I2: 49%; LOE: Low). Subgroups: 1) extremely low birth weight (ELBW: birth weight <1000 g) neonates: RPS was associated with significantly reduced NEC ≥ Stage II (4.5% compared with 7.9%). However, there was no difference in LOS and mortality. 2) Multistrain RPS was more effective than single strain. One study reported 3 nonfatal cases of probiotic sepsis. In summary, moderate- to low-quality evidence indicates that RPS was associated with significantly reduced NEC ≥ Stage II, LOS, and all-cause mortality in neonates <37 weeks of gestation and NEC ≥ Stage II in ELBW neonates.

摘要

对随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,益生菌可降低早产儿坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC≥II期)、晚发性败血症(LOS)、全因死亡率和喂养不耐受的风险。观察性研究的数据对于在临床实践中确认益生菌的效果很重要。我们旨在通过使用Cochrane方法对非随机对照试验进行系统评价,比较在早产儿(妊娠<37周)中实施常规益生菌补充(RPS)前后的结局。2020年5月检索了包括PubMed、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Embase、Cochrane中央图书馆和谷歌学术在内的数据库。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。效应大小的分类测量以OR和95%CI表示。通过卡方检验、I²统计量评估统计异质性。使用GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定和评价)指南总结证据水平(LOE)。主要结局为NEC≥II期、LOS和全因死亡率。次要结局包括益生菌败血症。纳入了来自18个国家的30项高质量非随机对照试验(n = 77,018)。荟萃分析表明,RPS与以下显著降低相关:1)NEC≥II期(30项研究,n = 77,018;OR:0.60;95%CI:0.50,0.73;P <0.00001,I²:65%;LOE:中等),2)LOS(21项研究,n = 65,858;OR:0.85;95%CI:0.74,0.97;P = 0.02,I²:74%;LOE:低),3)全因死亡率(27项非随机对照试验,n = 70,977;OR:0.77;95%CI:0.68,0.88;P = 0.0001,I²:49%;LOE:低)。亚组分析:1)极低出生体重(ELBW:出生体重<1000g)新生儿:RPS与NEC≥II期显著降低相关(4.5%对比7.9%)。然而,LOS和死亡率无差异。2)多菌株RPS比单菌株更有效。一项研究报告了3例非致命性益生菌败血症病例。总之,中低质量证据表明,RPS与妊娠<37周新生儿的NEC≥II期、LOS和全因死亡率显著降低以及ELBW新生儿的NEC≥II期显著降低相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Probiotics and the Risk of Infection.益生菌与感染风险
Clin Perinatol. 2025 Mar;52(1):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验