Feldman Keith, Noel-MacDonnell Janelle R, Pappas Lucy B, Romald Jermine Harriet, Olson Shelby L, Oschman Alexandra, Cuna Alain C, Sampath Venkatesh
Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Pediatr Res. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04072-3.
For preterm infants, supplementation with probiotics improves rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and other morbidities. Case reports of probiotic sepsis have prompted warnings from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Federal Drug Administration. However, incidence rates of probiotic sepsis are lacking, making it challenging to evaluate risk-benefit tradeoffs. We performed a meta-analysis and review of probiotic sepsis events in preterm infants to evaluate tradeoffs against NEC, mortality, and clinical sepsis outcomes.
Dual-reviewers screened 160 articles, selecting 77 for review. Pooled estimates of incidence were computed using random-effect models. Case reports captured infant demographics, hospital course, and outcome.
For 20,323 exposed infants across 63 studies, 8 probiotic sepsis cases were identified [estimate: 0% (95% CI: 0-10%)]. Risk-benefit calculations note an additional 62 cases of NEC, 42 deaths, and 92 clinical sepsis events in the unexposed cohort per case of probiotic sepsis. Case reports identified 27 probiotic sepsis events, mostly in extremely-low-birthweight infants (median GA/BW: 28 weeks, 970.0 g) and those at risk for bacterial translocation.
Probiotic sepsis is extremely rare in preterm infants, with the greatest risk in an identifiable sub-population. Estimates highlighted increased morbidities in unexposed cohorts compared to probiotic sepsis incidence, suggesting consideration of risk-benefit may be warranted.
This study quantifies the risk of probiotic sepsis in preterm infants utilizing a meta-analysis. In over 20,000 exposed infants across 40 randomized trials and 23 observational studies, 8 cases of probiotic sepsis were identified (<0.04%). Assessing this risk against improvements in morbidities with probiotic use, we can expect 62 more cases of NEC, 42 more deaths, and 92 more cases of clinical sepsis per case of probiotic sepsis (1:2500) avoided in the unexposed group. While the use of probiotics carries risk, rates for probiotic sepsis presented by this analysis highlight a favorable benefit/risk ratio in preterm infants.
对于早产儿,补充益生菌可提高坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)及其他疾病的发生率。益生菌败血症的病例报告促使美国儿科学会和联邦药物管理局发出警告。然而,益生菌败血症的发病率尚不清楚,这使得评估风险效益权衡具有挑战性。我们对早产儿益生菌败血症事件进行了荟萃分析和综述,以评估与NEC、死亡率和临床败血症结局的权衡。
两名审阅者筛选了160篇文章,选择77篇进行综述。使用随机效应模型计算发病率的合并估计值。病例报告记录了婴儿的人口统计学特征、住院过程和结局。
在63项研究中的20323名暴露婴儿中,发现了8例益生菌败血症病例[估计值:0%(95%CI:0-10%)]。风险效益计算表明,在未暴露队列中,每例益生菌败血症病例会额外出现62例NEC、42例死亡和92例临床败血症事件。病例报告确定了27例益生菌败血症事件,大多发生在极低出生体重儿(中位胎龄/体重:28周,970.0克)和有细菌易位风险的婴儿中。
益生菌败血症在早产儿中极为罕见,在可识别的亚组中风险最高。估计结果显示,与益生菌败血症发病率相比,未暴露队列中的发病率有所增加,这表明可能有必要考虑风险效益。
本研究通过荟萃分析量化了早产儿益生菌败血症的风险。在40项随机试验和23项观察性研究中的20000多名暴露婴儿中,发现了8例益生菌败血症病例(<0.04%)。将这一风险与使用益生菌改善疾病的情况进行评估,我们预计在未暴露组中,每避免一例益生菌败血症病例(1:2500),会额外出现62例NEC、42例死亡和92例临床败血症事件。虽然使用益生菌有风险,但本分析显示的益生菌败血症发生率表明,其在早产儿中的效益/风险比有利。