• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院医院的实验室检验申请:临床决策支持系统的效果和特征的系统评价。

Laboratory test ordering in inpatient hospitals: a systematic review on the effects and features of clinical decision support systems.

机构信息

Health Information Management Research Center (HIMRC), 5th of Qotb -e Ravandi Blvd, Kashan University of Medical Science, 87159-73449, Kashan, Iran.

Department of Health Information Management and Technology, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01384-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-01384-8
PMID:33461548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7814592/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have revealed inappropriate laboratory testing as a source of waste. This review aimed at evaluating the effects and features of CDSSs on physicians' appropriate laboratory test ordering in inpatient hospitals.

METHOD

Medline through PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried without any time period restriction. Studies using CDSSs as an intervention to improve laboratory test ordering as the primary aim were included. The study populations in the included studies were laboratory tests, physicians ordering laboratory tests, or the patients for whom laboratory tests were ordered. The included papers were evaluated for their outcomes related to the effect of CDSSs which were categorized based on the outcomes related to tests, physician, and patients. The primary outcome measures were the number and cost of the ordered laboratory tests. The instrument from The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NIH) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Moreover, we applied a checklist for assessing the quality and features of the CDSSs presented in the included studies. A narrative synthesis was used to describe and compare the designs and the results of included studies.

RESULT

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted based on a quasi-experimental design. The results showed improvement in laboratory test-related outcomes (e.g. proportion and cost of tests) and also physician-related outcomes (e.g. guideline adherence and orders cancellation). Patient-related outcomes (e.g. length of stay and mortality rate) were not well investigated in the included studies. In addition, the evidence about applying CDSS as a decision aid for interpreting laboratory results was rare.

CONCLUSION

CDSSs increase appropriate test ordering in hospitals through eliminating redundant test orders and enhancing evidence-based practice. Appropriate testing and cost saving were both affected by the CDSSs. However, the evidence is limited about the effects of laboratory test CDSSs on patient-related outcomes.

摘要

背景

研究表明,实验室检测不当是造成浪费的一个原因。本综述旨在评估计算机决策支持系统(CDSS)对住院医师适当的实验室检测医嘱的影响和特点。

方法

无时间限制地检索了 Medline 数据库(通过 PubMed)、SCOPUS、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库。纳入以 CDSS 作为干预措施,以改善实验室检测医嘱为主要目的的研究。纳入研究的研究人群为实验室检测、医师下达的实验室检测医嘱或接受实验室检测的患者。根据与 CDSS 效果相关的检测、医师和患者相关的结果对纳入的研究进行评估。主要结局指标为医嘱的实验室检测数量和成本。采用美国国立心肺血液研究所(NIH)的工具评估纳入研究的质量。此外,我们应用了一个评估纳入研究中 CDSS 质量和特点的清单。采用叙述性综合法来描述和比较纳入研究的设计和结果。

结果

16 项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究基于准实验设计。结果表明,实验室检测相关结局(如检测的比例和成本)和医师相关结局(如指南依从性和医嘱取消)得到改善。纳入研究中并未很好地调查患者相关结局(如住院时间和死亡率)。此外,关于将 CDSS 作为解释实验室结果的决策辅助工具的证据很少。

结论

CDSS 通过消除冗余的检测医嘱和增强基于证据的实践,增加了医院的适当检测医嘱。适当的检测和成本节约都受到 CDSS 的影响。然而,关于实验室检测 CDSS 对患者相关结局的影响的证据有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a30/7814592/2645389aedcc/12911_2020_1384_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a30/7814592/2645389aedcc/12911_2020_1384_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a30/7814592/2645389aedcc/12911_2020_1384_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Laboratory test ordering in inpatient hospitals: a systematic review on the effects and features of clinical decision support systems.住院医院的实验室检验申请:临床决策支持系统的效果和特征的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01384-8.
2
Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.计算机决策支持系统在诊断、筛查或监测检验申请方面的交流应用:系统的效果和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(48):1-227. doi: 10.3310/hta14480.
3
Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support Systems on the Appropriate Use of Imaging for Central Nervous System Injuries: A Systematic Review.临床决策支持系统对中枢神经系统损伤影像学应用的适宜性的影响:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):37-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740921. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Electronic Laboratory Medicine ordering with evidence-based Order sets in primary care (ELMO study): protocol for a cluster randomised trial.电子实验室医学医嘱与初级保健中基于证据的医嘱集(ELMO 研究):一项集群随机试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 6;12(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0685-6.
5
Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007).用于处方开具的计算机化临床决策支持系统能否改变医疗行为?对文献(1990 - 2007年)的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug 28;9:154. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-154.
6
Cost and turn-around time display decreases inpatient ordering of reference laboratory tests: a time series.费用和周转时间显示降低了住院患者对参考实验室检测的医嘱:一项时间序列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):994-1000. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003053. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
7
Factors determining the adherence to antimicrobial guidelines and the adoption of computerised decision support systems by physicians: A qualitative study in three European hospitals.影响医生遵循抗菌药物指南和采用计算机化决策支持系统的因素:在三家欧洲医院进行的定性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104233. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.药学计算机化临床决策支持对处方、临床及患者结局的影响:文献系统评价
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Apr;18(2):69-87.
9
Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management.通过临床决策支持和知识管理实现医疗保健决策。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Apr(203):1-784.
10
The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床用药决策支持系统对患者结局和医生实践表现的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01376-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing antiphospholipid antibody testing: a real-world analysis of appropriateness and resource utilization.优化抗磷脂抗体检测:对适宜性和资源利用的真实世界分析
Immunol Res. 2025 Sep 16;73(1):130. doi: 10.1007/s12026-025-09682-x.
2
Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews.低价值医疗实践去实施化的效果:系统评价概述。
Implement Sci. 2024 Aug 5;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01384-6.
3
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Clinical Laboratories.结直肠癌筛查:临床实验室的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical burden and healthcare resource utilization among patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism, overall and by adequately vs not adequately controlled disease: a multi-country chart review.慢性甲状旁腺功能减退症患者的临床负担和医疗资源利用情况:一项多国图表回顾,按疾病控制充分与不充分进行划分。
J Med Econ. 2019 Nov;22(11):1141-1152. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1624081. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
2
Healthcare resource utilization and costs by disease severity in an insured national sample of US patients with chronic hepatitis B.医疗保险覆盖的美国慢性乙型肝炎患者疾病严重程度与医疗资源利用和费用的关系。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
3
Clin Chem. 2024 Jan 4;70(1):150-164. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad198.
4
Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support Systems on the Appropriate Use of Imaging for Central Nervous System Injuries: A Systematic Review.临床决策支持系统对中枢神经系统损伤影像学应用的适宜性的影响:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):37-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740921. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
Laboratory testing in primary care: A systematic review of health IT impacts.
基层医疗中的实验室检测:健康信息技术影响的系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:52-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Reducing Test Utilization in Hospital Settings: A Narrative Review.减少医院环境中的检测利用:叙述性综述。
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Sep;38(5):402-412. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.402.
5
Reductions in Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Rates Using Real-Time Automated Clinical Criteria Verification to Enforce Appropriate Testing.实时自动化临床标准验证以强制进行适当检测,降低艰难梭菌感染(CDI)率。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 May;39(5):625-627. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.32. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
6
More than half of abnormal results from laboratory tests ordered by family physicians could be false-positive.家庭医生开出的实验室检查中,超过一半的异常结果可能是假阳性。
Can Fam Physician. 2018 Mar;64(3):202-203.
7
Impact of nonintrusive clinical decision support systems on laboratory test utilization in a large academic centre.非侵入性临床决策支持系统对大型学术中心实验室检查利用情况的影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):474-479. doi: 10.1111/jep.12890. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
Analysis of Daily Laboratory Orders at a Large Urban Academic Center: A Multifaceted Approach to Changing Test Ordering Patterns.大型城市学术中心每日实验室检查医嘱分析:改变检查医嘱开具模式的多方面方法
Am J Clin Pathol. 2017 Aug 1;148(2):128-135. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx054.
9
Use of Electronic Clinical Decision Support and Hard Stops to Decrease Unnecessary Thyroid Function Testing.使用电子临床决策支持和硬停止措施以减少不必要的甲状腺功能检测。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017 Apr 28;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u223041.w8346. eCollection 2017.
10
The Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Laboratory Test Ordering: A Systematic Review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对实验室检查医嘱的影响:一项系统评价
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Apr;141(4):585-595. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0115-RA.