Role of F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses.

BACKGROUND

Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE. F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219). F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.