• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童早期(2-5 岁)身体活动和屏幕时间的水平和相关因素:加拿大和韩国数据的跨文化比较。

Levels and correlates of physical activity and screen time among early years children (2-5 years): Cross-cultural comparisons between Canadian and South Korean data.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Sport Industry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2021 May;47(3):377-386. doi: 10.1111/cch.12850. Epub 2021 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1111/cch.12850
PMID:33463740
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cross-cultural research can provide insight into whether levels and correlates of movement behaviours among early years children vary across different cultural contexts. This study (1) compared children's physical activity (PA) and screen time (ST) and parental and environmental correlates of PA and ST between samples of Canadian and South Korean (Korean thereafter) early years children (2-5 years) and (2) investigated parental and environmental correlates of PA and ST and whether country moderates the relationships.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data from 121 Canadian children (3.4 years; 49.6% girls) and 101 Korean children (3.4 years; 54.9% girls) who participated in the Parents' Role in Establishing healthy Physical activity and Sedentary behaviour habits (PREPS) study were used. Demographic information, children's PA, ST, PA- or ST-specific parental cognitions and behaviours, and home and neighbourhood environments were measured using a proxy-reported questionnaire. Two-tailed independent samples T test or Mann Whitney U test, chi-square tests, linear regression and moderation analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Canadian children spent more time in non-organized PA compared to Korean children (111 vs. 63 min/day), whereas time spent in organized PA was higher in Korean children than Canadian children (25 vs. 9 min/day). Canadian children had more ST than Korean children (159 vs. 110 min/day). Similarly, Canadian parents reported higher screen (142 vs. 116 min/day) and sitting time (317 vs. 286 min/day) than Korean parents. Though children's behaviours, as well as parental cognitions and behaviours, varied between the two samples, similar correlates of children's PA and ST were observed. The relationship between presence of electronics in children's bedrooms and children's ST was moderated by country, with Canadian children showing a stronger relationship than Korean children.

CONCLUSIONS

Supporting parents to adopt cognitions and behaviours that are conducive to healthy PA and ST patterns of their own and their early years children may be important for both Canada and Korea.

摘要

背景

跨文化研究可以深入了解不同文化背景下幼儿的运动行为水平和相关性是否存在差异。本研究(1)比较了加拿大和韩国(以下简称韩国)幼儿(2-5 岁)样本中儿童身体活动(PA)和屏幕时间(ST)以及 PA 和 ST 的父母和环境相关性,(2)探讨了 PA 和 ST 的父母和环境相关性,以及国家是否调节这些关系。

方法

使用参加父母在建立健康的身体活动和久坐行为习惯中的作用(PREPS)研究的 121 名加拿大儿童(3.4 岁;49.6%女孩)和 101 名韩国儿童(3.4 岁;54.9%女孩)的横断面数据。使用代理报告的问卷测量人口统计学信息、儿童 PA、ST、PA 或 ST 特定的父母认知和行为以及家庭和邻里环境。进行了双尾独立样本 T 检验或曼-惠特尼 U 检验、卡方检验、线性回归和调节分析。

结果

与韩国儿童相比,加拿大儿童进行非组织性 PA 的时间更多(111 分钟/天比 63 分钟/天),而韩国儿童进行组织性 PA 的时间更多(25 分钟/天比 9 分钟/天)。加拿大儿童的 ST 时间比韩国儿童多(159 分钟/天比 110 分钟/天)。同样,加拿大父母报告的屏幕时间(142 分钟/天比 116 分钟/天)和坐姿时间(317 分钟/天比 286 分钟/天)也高于韩国父母。尽管两个样本中儿童的行为以及父母的认知和行为存在差异,但观察到了儿童 PA 和 ST 的相似相关性。电子产品在儿童卧室中的存在与儿童 ST 之间的关系受到国家的调节,加拿大儿童的关系比韩国儿童更强。

结论

支持父母采取有利于自己和幼儿健康 PA 和 ST 模式的认知和行为可能对加拿大和韩国都很重要。

相似文献

1
Levels and correlates of physical activity and screen time among early years children (2-5 years): Cross-cultural comparisons between Canadian and South Korean data.儿童早期(2-5 岁)身体活动和屏幕时间的水平和相关因素:加拿大和韩国数据的跨文化比较。
Child Care Health Dev. 2021 May;47(3):377-386. doi: 10.1111/cch.12850. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
2
Parent-perceived neighbourhood environment, parenting practices and preschool-aged children physical activity and screen time: a cross-sectional study of two culturally and geographically diverse cities.家长感知的邻里环境、育儿实践与学龄前儿童身体活动和屏幕时间:两个文化和地理差异城市的横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 27;22(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03377-0.
3
Environmental correlates of sedentary time and physical activity in preschool children living in a relatively rural setting in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional analysis of the GECKO Drenthe cohort.荷兰相对农村环境中学龄前儿童久坐时间和身体活动的环境相关性:GECKO 德伦特队列的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 14;9(5):e027468. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027468.
4
Moderators of movement behaviour changes among Canadian toddlers and preschoolers throughout the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠大流行期间加拿大学步儿童和学龄前儿童前 2 年的运动行为变化的调节因素。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Sep 1;49(9):1228-1240. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0453. Epub 2024 May 30.
5
Do physical activity and screen time mediate the association between European fathers' and their children's weight status? Cross-sectional data from the Feel4Diabetes-study.体育活动和屏幕时间是否在欧洲父亲和他们孩子的体重状况之间起中介作用?来自 Feel4Diabetes 研究的横断面数据。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 4;16(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0864-8.
6
Associations of parental attitudes and health behaviors with children's screen time over four years.父母态度和健康行为与儿童四年屏幕时间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;23(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15212-x.
7
Objectively measured physical activity in population-representative parent-child pairs: parental modelling matters and is context-specific.在具有代表性的亲子人群中客观测量的身体活动:父母的榜样作用很重要,且具有特定背景。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 17;18(1):1024. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5949-9.
8
Health-related parental indicators and their association with healthy weight and overweight/obese children's physical activity.与健康相关的父母指标及其与健康体重和超重/肥胖儿童身体活动的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 31;18(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5582-7.
9
Does home equipment contribute to socioeconomic gradients in Australian children's physical activity, sedentary time and screen time?家用设备是否会影响澳大利亚儿童身体活动、久坐时间和屏幕时间方面的社会经济梯度?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 5;16:736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3419-9.
10
Canadian children's and youth's adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A decision tree analysis.加拿大儿童和青少年在 COVID-19 大流行期间遵循 24 小时运动指南的情况:决策树分析。
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Jul;9(4):313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Modifiable Parenting Factors on the Screen Use of Children Five Years or Younger: A Systematic Review.可改变的育儿因素对五岁及以下儿童屏幕使用的影响:一项系统综述
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1007/s10567-025-00523-9.
2
Global trends in importance of 24-hour movement behaviors to pediatric health: implications for South Korea.24小时运动行为对儿童健康重要性的全球趋势:对韩国的启示
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2025 Jan;68(1):16-29. doi: 10.3345/cep.2024.00178. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
Correlates of screen time in the early years (0-5 years): A systematic review.
早年(0至5岁)屏幕使用时间的相关因素:一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Apr 19;33:102214. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102214. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Screen time and myopia: A serial multiple mediator SEM analysis.屏幕时间与近视:串联中介 SEM 分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:860098. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.860098. eCollection 2022.
5
Parent-perceived neighbourhood environment, parenting practices and preschool-aged children physical activity and screen time: a cross-sectional study of two culturally and geographically diverse cities.家长感知的邻里环境、育儿实践与学龄前儿童身体活动和屏幕时间:两个文化和地理差异城市的横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 27;22(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03377-0.
6
Prevalence of meeting 24-Hour Movement Guidelines from pre-school to adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis including 387,437 participants and 23 countries.从学前到青春期达到 24 小时身体活动指南的流行率:包括 387437 名参与者和 23 个国家的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Sport Health Sci. 2022 Jul;11(4):427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 20.