• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据罗伯逊分类法,妊娠风险是剖宫产的决定因素。

Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section according to the Robson Classification Groups.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;43(2):84-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718446. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1718446
PMID:33465796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10183909/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and compare the frequency of cesarean sections and vaginal deliveries through the Robson Classification in pregnant women attended at a tertiary hospital in two different periods.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, retrospective study of birth records, comprising 4,010 women, conducted from January 2014 to December 2015 in the only public regional referral hospital for the care of high- risk pregnancies, located in Southern Brazil.

RESULTS

The overall cesarean section rate reached 57.5% and the main indication was the existence of a previous uterine cesarean scar. Based on the Robson Classification, groups 5 (26.3%) and 10 (17.4%) were the most frequent ones. In 2015, there was a significant increase in the frequency of groups 1 and 3 ( < 0.001), when compared with the previous year, resulting in an increase in the number of vaginal deliveries ( < 0.0001) and a reduction in cesarean section rates.

CONCLUSION

The Robson Classification proved to be a useful tool to identify the profile of parturients and the groups with the highest risk of cesarean sections in different periods in the same service. Thus, it allows monitoring in a dynamic way the indications and delivery routes and developing actions to reduce cesarean rates according to the characteristics of the pregnant women attended.

摘要

目的

通过罗布斯分类法分析并比较在两家不同医院就诊的孕妇的剖宫产率和阴道分娩率。

方法

这是一项回顾性的横断面研究,纳入了 2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间在巴西南部唯一一家为高危妊娠提供服务的公立地区转诊医院的 4010 名产妇的分娩记录。

结果

总的剖宫产率为 57.5%,主要指征是存在既往子宫剖宫产瘢痕。根据 Robson 分类,第 5 组(26.3%)和第 10 组(17.4%)最为常见。2015 年,与前一年相比,第 1 组和第 3 组( < 0.001)的频率显著增加,导致阴道分娩数量增加( < 0.0001),剖宫产率降低。

结论

Robson 分类法被证明是一种有用的工具,可以识别不同时期同一服务中产妇的特征和剖宫产风险最高的人群。因此,它可以动态监测指征和分娩方式,并根据孕妇的特点采取行动来降低剖宫产率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eb2/10183909/3f5e8d629d03/10-1055-s-0040-1718446-i20190364-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eb2/10183909/3b9138f94fe9/10-1055-s-0040-1718446-i20190364-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eb2/10183909/9af0e5f9de11/10-1055-s-0040-1718446-i20190364-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eb2/10183909/3f5e8d629d03/10-1055-s-0040-1718446-i20190364-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eb2/10183909/3b9138f94fe9/10-1055-s-0040-1718446-i20190364-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eb2/10183909/9af0e5f9de11/10-1055-s-0040-1718446-i20190364-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eb2/10183909/3f5e8d629d03/10-1055-s-0040-1718446-i20190364-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section according to the Robson Classification Groups.根据罗伯逊分类法,妊娠风险是剖宫产的决定因素。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;43(2):84-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718446. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Evaluating vaginal-delivery rates after previous cesarean delivery using the Robson 10-group classification system at a tertiary center in Brazil.在巴西一家三级医疗中心,使用罗布森10组分类系统评估既往剖宫产术后的阴道分娩率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Mar;136(3):354-355. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12082. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.使用罗布森分类法评估巴西的剖宫产率:分娩支付来源的作用。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7.
4
Pattern of Live Births in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, According to Robson Groups and the Kotelchuck Index Classification - 2015/2016.根据 Robson 分组和 Kotelchuck 指数分类的 2015/2016 年巴西里约热内卢州活产儿模式。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;42(7):373-379. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712122. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification.2014 年至 2016 年巴西剖宫产率:使用 Robson 分类的横断面分析。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;42(9):522-528. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712134. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
6
The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system.项目适宜分娩和剖宫产率降低:应用罗伯逊分类系统进行的分析。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16919. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.高剖宫产率的合理剖析:使用罗布森十组分类系统的分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Apr;41(4):534-9. doi: 10.1111/jog.12608. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
8
Cesarean section rates according to the Robson Classification and its association with adequacy levels of prenatal care: a cross-sectional hospital-based study in Brazil.根据 Robson 分类的剖宫产率及其与产前保健充足水平的关系:巴西一项基于医院的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05768-2.
9
[Incidencia de la operación cesárea según la clasificación de Robson en el Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital Gral. Dr. Fernando Quiroz Gutiérrez del Instituto de Seguridad Social al Servicio de los Trabajadores del Estado].[根据罗布森分类法,在社会保障局下属的费尔南多·基罗斯·古铁雷斯博士综合医院妇产科对国家劳动者服务的剖宫产发生率]
Cir Cir. 2018;86(3):261-269. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.M18000044.
10
Exploring Obstetrical Interventions and Stratified Cesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification in Tertiary Care Hospitals in the United Arab Emirates.在阿拉伯联合酋长国的三级护理医院中,使用罗布森分类法探索产科干预措施和分层剖宫产率。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Mar;41(3):147-154. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676524. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Contribution of AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) to Cesarean Section Within Robson Classification Group.AIDA(人工智能难产算法)对罗布森分类组剖宫产的贡献。
J Imaging. 2025 Aug 16;11(8):276. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11080276.
2
Mobile Health Adoption in High-Risk Pregnancies Using Cluster Analysis of Biopsychosocial Outcomes: Observational Longitudinal Cohort Study.利用生物心理社会结局的聚类分析在高危妊娠中采用移动健康:观察性纵向队列研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 21;12:e67680. doi: 10.2196/67680.
3
A 10-year cesarean section rate analysis in a Brazilian referral maternity hospital using the Robson's ten group classification system.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates at three university hospital labor units using the Robson classification system.应用罗伯逊分类系统评价 3 所大学附属医院产房的剖宫产率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;146(1):118-125. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12842. Epub 2019 May 21.
2
Spatial distribution of Robson 10-group classification system and poverty in southern and southeastern Brazil.巴西南部和东南部的 Robson 10 组分类系统和贫困的空间分布。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;146(1):88-94. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12831. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
Implementation of the WHO manual for Robson classification: an example from Sri Lanka using a local database for developing quality improvement recommendations.
在一家巴西转诊妇产医院使用罗布森十组分类系统进行的10年剖宫产率分析。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 15;47. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo51. eCollection 2025.
4
Trend of incompleteness of the Robson Classification variables in the Live Birth Information (SINASC) in the state of Paraná, Brazil, 2014-2020.2014-2020 年巴西帕拉纳州活产信息(SINASC)中 Robson 分类变量不完整趋势。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2024 Feb 2;33:e2023632. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023632.EN. eCollection 2024.
实施世界卫生组织(WHO)罗伯逊分类手册:利用当地数据库为斯里兰卡制定质量改进建议的实例。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e027317. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027317.
4
Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor.应用于引产的罗布森分类系统
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Sep;40(9):513-517. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667340. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Robson 10-groups classification system to access C-section in two public hospitals of the Federal District/Brazil.在巴西联邦区的两家公立医院中采用罗布森十组分类系统评估剖宫产情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0192997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192997. eCollection 2018.
6
Is the Robson's classification system burdened by obstetric pathologies, maternal characteristics and assistential levels in comparing hospitals cesarean rates? A regional analysis of class 1 and 3.在比较医院剖宫产率时,罗布森分类系统是否受到产科病理、产妇特征和辅助水平的影响?对1级和3级的区域分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Jan;31(2):173-177. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1279142. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.使用罗布森分类法评估巴西的剖宫产率:分娩支付来源的作用。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7.
8
Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson's Ten-group Classification.使用罗布森十组分类法检查剖宫产率
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0738-1. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
9
Induction of Labour in Late and Postterm Pregnancies and its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome.晚期妊娠和过期妊娠的引产及其对母婴结局的影响。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Jul;76(7):793-798. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107672.
10
Induction of labor: does indication matter?引产:指征重要吗?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(6):1195-1201. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4171-1. Epub 2016 Aug 8.