• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家级质量改进合作项目结束后社区医院儿童哮喘护理质量的可持续性

Sustainability of paediatric asthma care quality in community hospitals after ending a national quality improvement collaborative.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):876-883. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012292. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012292
PMID:33468549
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community hospitals, which care for most hospitalised children in the USA, may be vulnerable to declines in paediatric care quality when quality improvement (QI) initiatives end. We aimed to evaluate changes in care quality in community hospitals after the end of the Pathways for Improving Paediatric Asthma Care (PIPA) national QI collaborative.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study during and after PIPA. PIPA included 45 community hospitals, of which 34 completed the 12-month collaborative and were invited for extended sustainability monitoring (total of 21-24 months from collaborative start). PIPA provided paediatric asthma pathways, educational materials/seminars, QI mentorship, monthly data reports, a mobile application and peer-to-peer learning opportunities. Access to pathways, educational materials and the mobile application remained during sustainability monitoring. Charts were reviewed for children aged 2-17 years old hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of asthma (maximum 20 monthly per hospital). Outcomes included measures of guideline adherence (early bronchodilator administration via metered-dose inhaler (MDI), secondhand smoke screening and referral to smoking cessation resources) and length of stay (LOS). We evaluated outcomes using multilevel regression models adjusted for patient mix, using an interrupted time-series approach.

RESULTS

We analysed 2159 hospitalisations from 23 hospitals (68% of eligible). Participating hospitals were structurally similar to those that dropped out but had more improvement in guideline adherence during the collaborative (29% vs 15%, p=0.02). The end of the collaborative was associated with a significant initial decrease in early MDI administration (81%-68%) (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.26 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.42)) and decreased rate of referral to smoking cessation resources (2.2% per month increase to 0.3% per month decrease) (aOR 0.86 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.98)) but no significant changes in LOS or secondhand smoke screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The end of a paediatric asthma QI collaborative was associated with concerning declines in guideline adherence in community hospitals.

摘要

背景

在美国,大多数住院儿童都由社区医院照顾,当质量改进(QI)计划结束时,这些医院可能会面临儿科医疗质量下降的风险。我们旨在评估 Pathways for Improving Paediatric Asthma Care(PIPA)国家 QI 合作结束后社区医院的护理质量变化。

方法

我们在 PIPA 期间和之后进行了一项纵向队列研究。PIPA 包括 45 家社区医院,其中 34 家完成了为期 12 个月的合作,并受邀进行了延长的可持续性监测(从合作开始后总共 21-24 个月)。PIPA 提供了儿科哮喘途径、教育材料/研讨会、QI 指导、每月数据报告、移动应用程序和同行学习机会。在可持续性监测期间,仍然可以获得途径、教育材料和移动应用程序。对因哮喘(每家医院最多每月 20 例)这一主要诊断住院的 2-17 岁儿童的图表进行了审查。结果包括指南遵守情况的衡量标准(通过计量吸入器(MDI)进行早期支气管扩张剂治疗、二手烟筛查和转介至戒烟资源)和住院时间(LOS)。我们使用多水平回归模型评估了结果,该模型根据患者组合进行了调整,采用了中断时间序列方法。

结果

我们分析了来自 23 家医院的 2159 例住院病例(占合格病例的 68%)。参与医院在结构上与退出的医院相似,但在合作期间指南的遵守程度有所提高(29%比 15%,p=0.02)。合作结束与早期 MDI 治疗的显著初始下降相关(81%-68%)(调整后的比值比(aOR)0.26(95%CI 0.15-0.42)),以及转介至戒烟资源的比例下降(每月增加 2.2%至每月减少 0.3%)(aOR 0.86(95%CI 0.75-0.98)),但 LOS 或二手烟筛查没有显著变化。

结论

儿科哮喘 QI 合作结束与社区医院指南遵守情况的令人担忧的下降有关。

相似文献

1
Sustainability of paediatric asthma care quality in community hospitals after ending a national quality improvement collaborative.国家级质量改进合作项目结束后社区医院儿童哮喘护理质量的可持续性
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):876-883. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012292. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Pathways for Improving Inpatient Pediatric Asthma Care (PIPA): A Multicenter, National Study.改善住院儿科哮喘护理途径(PIPA):一项多中心、全国性研究。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3026. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
Strategies for sustaining high-quality pediatric asthma care in community hospitals.社区医院维持高质量儿童哮喘护理的策略。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):125-136. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13870. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
Impact of a National Quality Collaborative on Pediatric Asthma Care Quality by Insurance Status.国家质量合作对保险状况下儿科哮喘护理质量的影响。
Acad Pediatr. 2021 Aug;21(6):1018-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
5
Predictors of Quality Improvement in Pediatric Asthma Care.儿科哮喘护理质量改善的预测因素。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Dec;10(12):1114-1119. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0163.
6
Association of an Asthma Improvement Collaborative With Health Care Utilization in Medicaid-Insured Pediatric Patients in an Urban Community.城市社区中医疗补助保险的儿科患者哮喘改善协作组织与医疗保健利用的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Nov 1;171(11):1072-1080. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2600.
7
Effectiveness of Pediatric Asthma Pathways in Community Hospitals: A Multisite Quality Improvement Study.社区医院儿科哮喘治疗路径的有效性:一项多中心质量改进研究。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Oct 26;5(6):e355. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000355. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
8
Pathways to Improve Pediatric Asthma Care: A Multisite, National Study of Emergency Department Asthma Pathway Implementation.改善儿科哮喘护理的途径:一项多地点、全国性的急诊哮喘途径实施研究。
J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;223:100-107.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.080. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
Improving efficiency of pediatric emergency asthma treatment by using metered dose inhaler.使用定量吸入器提高小儿急诊哮喘治疗的效率。
J Asthma. 2019 Oct;56(10):1079-1086. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1514629. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
The Irish national chronic obstructive pulmonary disease quality improvement collaborative: an adaptive learning collaborative.爱尔兰国家慢性阻塞性肺疾病质量改进合作组织:一种适应性学习合作组织。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 8;13(1):e002356. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002356.

引用本文的文献

1
Readiness of General Hospitals That Participate in Pediatric Quality Improvement Initiatives.参与儿科质量改进计划的综合医院的准备情况。
Hosp Pediatr. 2025 Mar 1;15(3):273-282. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2024-007930.
2
Changing patterns of routine laboratory testing over time at children's hospitals.随着时间的推移,儿童医院常规实验室检测模式的变化。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Aug;19(8):671-679. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13372. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
3
Sustainability determinants of an intervention to identify clinical deterioration and improve childhood cancer survival in Latin American hospitals: the INSPIRE study protocol.
拉丁美洲医院一项旨在识别临床病情恶化并提高儿童癌症生存率的干预措施的可持续性决定因素:INSPIRE研究方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Nov 17;4(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00519-y.
4
Challenges to sustainability of pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) in low-resource hospitals in Latin America.拉丁美洲资源匮乏医院中儿科早期预警系统(PEWS)可持续性面临的挑战。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Oct 31;2:1004805. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1004805. eCollection 2022.
5
The Perils of a "My Work Here is Done" perspective: a mixed methods evaluation of sustainment of an evidence-based intervention for transient ischemic attack.“我已完成任务”观点的危害:对一项基于证据的短暂性脑缺血发作干预措施维持情况的混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 4;22(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08207-8.
6
Strategies for sustaining high-quality pediatric asthma care in community hospitals.社区医院维持高质量儿童哮喘护理的策略。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):125-136. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13870. Epub 2021 Sep 7.