Liu Zining, Wang Yinkui, Shan Fei, Ying Xiangji, Zhang Yan, Li Shuangxi, Jia Yongning, Li Ziyu, Ji Jiafu
Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China.
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Jan 11;13:147-161. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S285361. eCollection 2021.
The duration and the optimal time to adjuvant chemotherapy (TAC) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) have net not been sufficiently demonstrated. Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus gastrectomy is increasingly utilized, making the question more complicated.
Data were collected from patients with LAGC who underwent 5-Fu-based doublet regimens as adjuvant treatment after gastrectomy in a single-center database. TAC and duration (cycles) were used to evaluate survival outcomes.
A total of 816 patients were included. Patients received over six cycles and TAC less than 42 days significantly correlated with better survival (log-rank <0.001). The analysis of TAC and number cycles were separately applied in perioperative chemotherapy (PEC) and postoperative chemotherapy (POC) group using Cox regression. The number of cycles revealed a statistical significance improving OS rate both in POC (HR=0.904, 95% CI=0.836-0.977, =0.011) and PEC (HR=0.887, 95% CI=0.798-0.986, =0.026), while only in POC did the TAC show an increasing trend of risk with borderline significance (OS: HR=1.008, 95% CI=0.999-1.018, =0.094; PFS: HR=1.009, 95% CI=1.000-1.018, =0.055). A spline model demonstrates the less improvement in survival after cycles of chemotherapy reaching six.
Our findings suggest that TAC is more likely to downregulate the survival benefit in POC rather than PEC, while overall survival is susceptible to cumulative cycles of chemotherapy in both groups. Furthermore, six cycles of chemotherapy tended to reach the maximum survival benefits. Prospective confirmation is required.
局部进展期胃癌(LAGC)辅助化疗(TAC)的疗程及最佳时间尚未得到充分证实。新辅助化疗加胃切除术后序贯辅助化疗(AC)的应用越来越多,这使得问题更加复杂。
从一个单中心数据库中收集接受以5-氟尿嘧啶为基础的双联方案作为胃切除术后辅助治疗的LAGC患者的数据。用TAC和疗程(周期)来评估生存结局。
共纳入816例患者。接受超过六个周期治疗且TAC少于42天与更好的生存显著相关(对数秩检验<0.001)。使用Cox回归分别在围手术期化疗(PEC)组和术后化疗(POC)组中对TAC和周期数进行分析。周期数显示在POC组(HR = 0.904,95%CI = 0.836 - 0.977,P = 0.011)和PEC组(HR = 0.887,95%CI = 0.798 - 0.986,P = 0.026)中均对提高总生存率有统计学意义,而仅在POC组中TAC显示出风险增加趋势且具有临界显著性(总生存期:HR = 1.008,95%CI = 0.999 - 1.018,P = 0.094;无进展生存期:HR = 1.009,95%CI = 1.000 - 1.018,P = 0.055)。样条模型显示化疗周期达到六个后生存改善较少。
我们的研究结果表明,TAC更有可能降低POC组而非PEC组的生存获益,而两组的总生存期均易受化疗累积周期的影响。此外,六个周期的化疗往往能达到最大生存获益。需要前瞻性证实。