Department of Hematology of Anhui Provincial Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, People's Republic of China.
Ann Hematol. 2021 May;100(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04413-2. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
This is a retrospective study comparing the effectiveness of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and chemotherapy for patients in the first complete remission period for acute myeloid leukemia with KMT2A-MLLT3 rearrangements. A total of 22 patients were included, all of whom achieved first complete remission (CR1) through 1-2 rounds of induction chemotherapy, excluding patients with an early relapse. Twelve patients were treated with UCBT, and 10 patients were treated with chemotherapy after 2 to 4 courses of consolidation therapy. The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the UCBT group was 71.3% (95% CI, 34.4-89.8%), and that of the chemotherapy group was 10% (95% CI, 5.89-37.3%). The OS of the UCBT group was significantly higher than that of the chemotherapy group (P = 0.003). The disease-free survival (DFS) of the UCBT group was 60.8% (95% CI, 25.0-83.6%), which was significantly higher than the 10% (95% CI, 5.72-35.8%) of the chemotherapy group (P = 0.003). The relapse rate of the UCBT group was 23.6% (95% CI, 0-46.8%), and that of the chemotherapy group was 85.4% (95% CI, 35.8-98.4%), which was significantly higher than that of the UCBT group (P < 0.001). The non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate in the UCBT group was 19.8% (95% CI, 0-41.3%), and that in the chemotherapy group was 0.0%. The NRM rate in the UCBT group was higher than that in the chemotherapy group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.272). Two patients in the UCBT group relapsed, two died of acute and chronic GVHD, and one patient developed chronic GVHD 140 days after UCBT and is still alive, so the GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 50% (95% CI, 17.2-76.1%). AML patients with KMT2A-MLLT3 rearrangements who receive chemotherapy as their consolidation therapy after CR1 have a very poor prognosis. UCBT can overcome the poor prognosis and significantly improve survival, and the GRFS for these patients is very good. We suggest that UCBT is a better choice than chemotherapy for KMT2A-MLLT3 patients.
这是一项回顾性研究,比较了伴有 KMT2A-MLLT3 重排的急性髓系白血病患者在首次完全缓解期行脐带血移植(UCBT)和化疗的疗效。共纳入 22 例患者,均通过 1-2 轮诱导化疗达到首次完全缓解(CR1),排除早期复发患者。12 例患者接受 UCBT 治疗,10 例患者在 2-4 个疗程巩固治疗后接受化疗。UCBT 组的 3 年总生存(OS)率为 71.3%(95%CI,34.4-89.8%),化疗组为 10%(95%CI,5.89-37.3%)。UCBT 组的 OS 明显高于化疗组(P=0.003)。UCBT 组的无疾病生存(DFS)率为 60.8%(95%CI,25.0-83.6%),明显高于化疗组的 10%(95%CI,5.72-35.8%)(P=0.003)。UCBT 组的复发率为 23.6%(95%CI,0-46.8%),化疗组为 85.4%(95%CI,35.8-98.4%),明显高于 UCBT 组(P<0.001)。UCBT 组的非复发死亡率(NRM)为 19.8%(95%CI,0-41.3%),化疗组为 0.0%。UCBT 组的 NRM 率高于化疗组,但两组间无显著差异(P=0.272)。UCBT 组有 2 例患者复发,2 例死于急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病,1 例患者在 UCBT 后 140 天发生慢性移植物抗宿主病,仍存活,因此无移植物抗宿主病/复发(GRFS)率为 50%(95%CI,17.2-76.1%)。CR1 后接受化疗作为巩固治疗的伴有 KMT2A-MLLT3 重排的 AML 患者预后极差。UCBT 可克服不良预后,显著改善生存,且此类患者的 GRFS 非常好。我们建议 UCBT 是 KMT2A-MLLT3 患者优于化疗的选择。