Suppr超能文献

中国东北吉林前安多含水层地下水氟化学与健康风险评估。

Groundwater fluoride chemistry and health risk assessment of multi-aquifers in Jilin Qianan, Northeastern China.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Jilin University, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130021, China; National Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion, Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Changchun 130021, China; College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Global Geosolutionz, Typesetters Biz Complex, Department of Geology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria 810107, Nigeria.

Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Jilin University, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130021, China; National Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion, Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Changchun 130021, China; College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.

出版信息

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Mar 15;211:111926. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111926. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

Abstract

Groundwater from deep confined aquifers is often recommended for use because of it's low fluoride health risk. Thus, this study appraised groundwater fluoride hydrochemistry in a multi-aquifer system in Jilin Qianan to determine the non-carcinogenic health risk liable from exploiting the respective aquifers. 124 samples collected from the tertiary confined aquifer (N), quaternary confined aquifer (Q), and quaternary phreatic aquifer (Q) during surveys in 2001 and 2017 was analyzed using hydrochemical, statistical, spatial, and health risk assessment methods. Results show that the dominant water facies in the respective aquifer layers was Na+K-HCO+CO except in Q where Ca+Mg - HCO + CO was marginally dominant. Fluoride concentrations outside the recommended guideline occurred in all the aquifers except N, where concentrations were optimum. The mean fluoride concentration of groundwater in the aquifers was of the order Q (2017) > Q (2001) > Q > N ( mean 2.09, 2.03, 1.41 and 0.75 mg/L with 51.85%, 57.44%, 36.36% and 0% occurring beyond recommended guideline values respectively). Silicate weathering, cation exchange, and fluorite dissolution in an alkaline environment were the significant fluoride contributing processes. Evaporation and MgF complex additionally influenced Q and Q (2017). The total hazard quotient (THQ) from oral and dermal pathways shows fluoride health risks in the order: infant > children > adult. The associated risks likely from using water in the respective aquifer layers is of the order Q (2017) > Q (2001) > Q > N. The mean groundwater fluoride in 2017 was marginally higher than that of 2001 ( 2.09>2.03 mg/L respectively) although the percentage of age group members disposed to fluoride risk from using water from Q decreased from 2001 to 2017. Knowledge of local hydrogeology in exploiting deep groundwater free of fluoride pollution and on-site defluoridation treatment of groundwater was recommended in the study area and other areas with similar characteristics.

摘要

地下水从深部承压含水层中通常被推荐使用,因为其氟化物的健康风险较低。因此,本研究评估了吉林省乾安县多含水层系统中的地下水氟化物水化学特征,以确定开采各含水层的非致癌健康风险。2001 年和 2017 年调查期间,从第三系承压含水层(N)、第四系承压含水层(Q)和第四系潜水含水层(Q)中采集了 124 个样本,采用水化学、统计、空间和健康风险评估方法进行了分析。结果表明,除 Q 层外,各含水层层中的主导水相均为 Na+K-HCO+CO,而在 Q 层中,Ca+Mg-HCO+CO 则略有优势。除 N 层外,所有含水层中的氟化物浓度均超出了推荐标准,而 N 层的氟化物浓度则处于最佳状态。各含水层地下水的平均氟化物浓度顺序为 Q(2017)>Q(2001)>Q> N(均值分别为 2.09、2.03、1.41 和 0.75mg/L,分别有 51.85%、57.44%、36.36%和 0%的浓度超出了推荐标准值)。硅酸盐风化、阳离子交换和碱性环境下萤石的溶解是氟化物的主要贡献过程。蒸发和 MgF 络合物也会影响 Q 和 Q(2017)层。经口服和皮肤途径的总危害商(THQ)表明,氟化物对健康的危害顺序为:婴儿>儿童>成人。从各含水层层中使用水的相关风险顺序为:Q(2017)>Q(2001)>Q>N。2017 年地下水氟化物的平均值略高于 2001 年(分别为 2.09>2.03mg/L),尽管 2017 年使用 Q 层水的年龄组人群中易受氟化物风险的比例较 2001 年有所下降。本研究建议在研究区及其他具有类似特征的地区,应了解当地深部地下水的水文地质情况,避免氟污染,并对地下水进行现场除氟处理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验