• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据MRI LI-RADS诊断分类的超声引导下粗针活检的诊断性能

Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy according to MRI LI-RADS diagnostic categories.

作者信息

Kim Dong Wook, Kim So Yeon, Kang Hyo Jeong, Kang Ji Hun, Lee Seung Soo, Shim Ju Hyun, Choi Sang Hyun, Shin Yong Moon, Byun Jae Ho

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ultrasonography. 2021 Jul;40(3):387-397. doi: 10.14366/usg.20110. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

DOI:10.14366/usg.20110
PMID:33472289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8217794/
Abstract

PURPOSE

According to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines, biopsy is a diagnostic option for focal hepatic lesions depending on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) according to LI-RADS categories.

METHODS

A total of 145 High-risk patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by CNB for a focal hepatic lesion preoperatively were retrospectively enrolled. Focal hepatic lesions on MRI were evaluated according to LI-RADS version 2018. Pathologic results were categorized into HCC, non-HCC malignancies, and benignity. The categorization was defined as correct when the CNB pathology and surgical pathology reports were identical. Nondiagnostic results were defined as inadequate CNB pathology findings for a specific diagnosis. The proportion of correct categorizations was calculated for each LI-RADS category, excluding nondiagnostic results.

RESULTS

After excluding 16 nondiagnostic results, 131 lesions were analyzed (45 LR-5, 24 LR-4, 4 LR-3, and 58 LR-M). All LR-5 lesions were HCC, and CNB correctly categorized 97.8% (44/45) of LR-5 lesions. CNB correctly categorized all 24 LR-4 lesions, 16.7% (4/24) of which were non-HCC malignancies. All LR-M lesions were malignant, and 62.1% (36/58) were non-HCC malignancies. CNB correctly categorized 93.1% (54/58) of LR-M lesions, and 12.5% (3/24) of lesions with CNB results of HCC were confirmed as non-HCC malignancies.

CONCLUSION

In agreement with AASLD guidelines, CNB could be helpful for LR-4 lesions, but is unnecessary for LR-5 lesions. In LR-M lesions, CNB results of HCC did not exclude non-HCC malignancy.

摘要

目的

根据美国肝病研究协会(AASLD)指南,活检是根据肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)分类对肝脏局灶性病变进行诊断的一种选择。我们根据LI-RADS分类评估了超声引导下粗针活检(CNB)的诊断性能。

方法

回顾性纳入145例肝细胞癌(HCC)高危患者,这些患者术前接受了磁共振成像(MRI)检查,随后对肝脏局灶性病变进行了CNB。根据2018版LI-RADS对MRI上的肝脏局灶性病变进行评估。病理结果分为HCC、非HCC恶性肿瘤和良性病变。当CNB病理报告和手术病理报告一致时,分类被定义为正确。非诊断性结果被定义为CNB病理结果不足以进行特定诊断。计算每个LI-RADS分类中正确分类的比例,不包括非诊断性结果。

结果

排除16例非诊断性结果后,分析了131个病变(45个LR-5、24个LR-4、4个LR-3和58个LR-M)。所有LR-5病变均为HCC,CNB正确分类了97.8%(44/45)的LR-5病变。CNB正确分类了所有24个LR-4病变,其中16.7%(4/24)为非HCC恶性肿瘤。所有LR-M病变均为恶性,62.1%(36/58)为非HCC恶性肿瘤。CNB正确分类了93.1%(54/58)的LR-M病变,CNB结果为HCC的病变中有12.5%(3/24)被确认为非HCC恶性肿瘤。

结论

与AASLD指南一致,CNB对LR-4病变可能有帮助,但对LR-5病变则不必要。在LR-M病变中,CNB的HCC结果不能排除非HCC恶性肿瘤。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy according to MRI LI-RADS diagnostic categories.根据MRI LI-RADS诊断分类的超声引导下粗针活检的诊断性能
Ultrasonography. 2021 Jul;40(3):387-397. doi: 10.14366/usg.20110. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
2
Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS.肝细胞癌风险患者中非肝细胞癌恶性肿瘤的诊断:对比增强超声LI-RADS与CT/MRI LI-RADS
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 12;11:641195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641195. eCollection 2021.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.超声造影对肝细胞癌鉴别诊断的诊断准确性:爱克发与CEUS-LI-RADS对比
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;29(9):1036-1044. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000916.
4
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS.对比增强超声 LI-RADS 2017:与 CT/MRI LI-RADS 的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Feb;31(2):847-854. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07159-z. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018、LI-RADS 版本 2017 和 OPTN 标准用于诊断肝细胞癌的性能比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Nov;215(5):1085-1092. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22772. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of prospective application of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI.前瞻性应用肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)在钆塞酸增强 MRI 中的诊断准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):2038-2046. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5188-y. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.CEUS LI-RADS 在肝癌风险患者中对 20mm 或更小的肝脏结节的特征诊断准确性。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):329-339. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191086. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
8
Radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma does not preclude biopsy before treatment.肝细胞癌的放射学诊断并不排除在治疗前进行活检。
JHEP Rep. 2023 Nov 3;6(1):100957. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100957. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?肝细胞癌:钆塞酸增强磁共振和弥散加权成像的 LI-RADS v2017 能否提高诊断准确性?
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 7;25(5):622-631. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i5.622.
10
Contrast ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 identifies hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a multicenter restropective study of 1,006 nodules.在一项多中心回顾性研究中,1006 个结节的对比超声 LI-RADS LR-5 可识别肝硬化中的肝细胞癌。
J Hepatol. 2018 Mar;68(3):485-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of LI-RADS category 5 vs combined categories 4 and 5: a systemic review and meta-analysis.LI-RADS 类别 5 与类别 4 和 5 联合的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov;34(11):7025-7040. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10813-5. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy for suspected viable hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment: a single-arm prospective study.对比增强超声引导下活检对治疗后疑似存活肝细胞癌的有效性:一项单臂前瞻性研究。
Ultrasonography. 2024 Mar;43(2):88-97. doi: 10.14366/usg.23133. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the 2017 and 2018 versions of LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI.对比钆塞酸增强 MRI 上 2017 版和 2018 版 LI-RADS 对肝细胞癌的诊断性能。
Clin Radiol. 2020 Apr;75(4):319.e1-319.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
2
Combining imaging and tumour biopsy improves the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma.联合影像与肿瘤活检可提高混合性肝细胞肝癌胆管细胞癌的诊断。
Liver Int. 2019 Dec;39(12):2386-2396. doi: 10.1111/liv.14261. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
3
Meta-analysis of the accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.
肝脏影像报告和数据系统 2018 版第 5 类诊断肝细胞癌:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Mar;34(3):1502-1514. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10134-z. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Refining Liver Biopsy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An In-Depth Exploration of Shifting Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.肝细胞癌中肝脏活检的优化:对诊断和治疗应用转变的深入探索
Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 21;11(8):2324. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082324.
肝脏影像报告和数据系统4类或5类诊断肝细胞癌准确性的Meta分析
Gut. 2019 Sep;68(9):1719-1721. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318555. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
4
Age independent survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without metastases at diagnosis: a population-based study.年龄独立的生存获益:诊断时无转移的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的基于人群研究。
Gut. 2020 Jan;69(1):168-176. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318193. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
5
Emerging Role of the Pathologist in Precision Medicine for HCC.病理学家在肝癌精准医学中的新兴作用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Apr;64(4):928-933. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05548-z.
6
Negative Biopsy of Focal Hepatic Lesions: Decision Tree Model for Patient Management.肝脏局灶性病变阴性活检:患者管理的决策树模型。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar;212(3):677-685. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20268. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
7
Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review.肝脏成像报告和数据系统在肝细胞癌或总体恶性肿瘤的计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像分析中的准确性:系统评价。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar;156(4):976-986. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.020. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
8
LI-RADS Classification and Prognosis of Primary Liver Cancers at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI.钆塞酸增强 MRI 对原发性肝癌的 LI-RADS 分类与预后评估。
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):388-397. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181290. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
9
Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gadoxetic Acid and Extracellular Contrast for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.钆塞酸二钠与细胞外对比剂磁共振成像用于肝脏影像报告与数据系统诊断肝细胞癌的前瞻性个体内比较。
Hepatology. 2018 Dec;68(6):2254-2266. doi: 10.1002/hep.30122. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
10
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.欧洲肝脏研究学会临床实践指南:肝细胞癌的管理
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.