• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[经桡动脉外周血管介入的临床研究]

[Clinical study of peripheral vascular intervention via radial artery].

作者信息

Li Y W, Cao J W, Zhang X W, Zhao H, Gong T, Li J G, Li X

机构信息

Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 23;43(1):143-146. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191018-00673.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191018-00673
PMID:33472328
Abstract

To discuss the safety and feasibility of transradial access (TRA) in performing peripheral arterial intervention. The clinical data of the patients underwent peripheral vascular intervention via TRA in our hospital from September 2017 to March 2019 were reviewed. The success rate of radial artery puncture and subsequent operation after puncture, and related postoperative complications within 30 days were analyzed. The clinical data of 112 peripheral arterial intervention procedures via TRA performed on 106 patients were reviewed, including transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in 83 cases, bronchial arterial infusion in 4 cases, pelvic tumor embolization in 11 cases and 14 other cases. The success rate of all interventional punctures was 97.3% (109/112), the operative success rate of interventional procedures was 98.2% (107/109). The TRA operation was failed in 5 patients, who were then converted to receive the femoral artery puncture and complete successfully. The severe complication of the operation was aortic dissection (2 cases). Minor complications included 2 cases of radial artery occlusion, radial artery spasm, arm pain and puncture point hematoma for each case. The severe complication and the minor complication rates were 1.8% (2/112) and 4.5% (5/112), respectively. Sixteen emergency operations were performed successfully, and no complication occurred. The TRA is a clinically safe and feasible approach for peripheral arterial interventional procedure.

摘要

探讨经桡动脉途径(TRA)进行外周动脉介入治疗的安全性和可行性。回顾了2017年9月至2019年3月在我院经TRA行外周血管介入治疗患者的临床资料。分析桡动脉穿刺成功率、穿刺后后续手术成功率及术后30天内相关并发症情况。回顾了对106例患者进行的112例经TRA外周动脉介入治疗的临床资料,其中包括经导管动脉化疗栓塞术83例、支气管动脉灌注术4例、盆腔肿瘤栓塞术11例及其他14例。所有介入穿刺成功率为97.3%(109/112),介入手术成功率为98.2%(107/109)。5例患者TRA手术失败,随后转为股动脉穿刺并成功完成手术。手术严重并发症为主动脉夹层(2例)。轻微并发症包括桡动脉闭塞2例、桡动脉痉挛、手臂疼痛及穿刺点血肿各1例。严重并发症和轻微并发症发生率分别为1.8%(2/112)和4.5%(5/112)。成功实施16例急诊手术,无并发症发生。TRA是外周动脉介入治疗临床上安全可行的方法。

相似文献

1
[Clinical study of peripheral vascular intervention via radial artery].[经桡动脉外周血管介入的临床研究]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 23;43(1):143-146. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191018-00673.
2
Safety and feasibility of transradial infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease interventions.经桡动脉入路治疗下肢动脉疾病的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1237-1246.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Distal Radial Artery Approach for Coronary Angiography: A Retrospective Study.经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Heart Surg Forum. 2023 Oct 25;26(5):E577-E583. doi: 10.59958/hsf.5887.
4
Safety and efficacy of radial access in trauma in 65 trauma endovascular cases.65例创伤性血管内治疗病例中经桡动脉入路的安全性和有效性
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1564-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.227. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Transradial Approach for Noncoronary Interventions: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility in the First 1,500 Cases.非冠状动脉介入的桡动脉途径:单中心对前1500例病例安全性和可行性的回顾
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
6
Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Transradial, Transbrachial, and Transfemoral Approach for Mesenteric Arterial Procedures.经桡动脉、肱动脉和股动脉入路肠系膜动脉介入治疗的单中心回顾性对比分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jan;31(1):130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.08.026. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
7
A reality check in transradial access: a single-centre comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for abdominal and peripheral intervention.经桡动脉入路的现实情况检查:经桡动脉与经股动脉入路用于腹部和外周介入的单中心比较。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5580-2. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
Transulnar approach as an alternative to transradial approach in non-coronary intervention: safety, feasibility and technical factors.非冠状动脉介入中经尺动脉途径替代经桡动脉途径:安全性、可行性及技术因素
J Vasc Access. 2017 May 15;18(3):250-254. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000691. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
The Left Distal Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A US Experience.冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的左桡动脉远端入路:美国经验
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):786-789. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Distal transradial versus conventional transradial access in acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中经桡动脉远端与传统入路的比较。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2021 Jun;49(4):257-265. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2021.64000.