Suppr超能文献

新型冠状病毒肺炎与医护人员:风险与预防措施的快速系统综述

COVID-19 and healthcare workers: a rapid systematic review into risks and preventive measures.

机构信息

Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e042270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042270.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic is demanding for occupational medicine and for public health. As healthcare workers (HCWs) fight impacts of SARS-CoV-2 on front lines, we must create safe work environments through comprehensive risk assessments, evaluation and effective implementation of counter-measures. We ask: 'What does current literature report on health risks at workplaces regarding COVID-19?' and 'What do current studies report on the effectiveness of enacted preventative recommendations?'

METHODS

As a snapshot of early HCW research, on 26 April 2020, we conducted a rapid systematic literature search in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and PsycInfo) for COVID-19-related health outcomes and preventive measures in healthcare-associated workplaces.

RESULTS

27 studies were identified as relevant for exploring the risk of infection, 11 studies evaluated preventive measures. The studies described that SARS-CoV-2 impacts significantly on HCW's health and well-being, not only through infections (n=6), but also from a mental health perspective (n=16). 4 studies reported indirect risks such as skin injuries, one study described headaches to result from the use of personal protective equipment. Few studies provided information on the effectiveness of prevention strategies. Overall, most studies on health risks as well as on the effectiveness of preventive measures were of a moderate-to-low quality; this was mainly due to limitations in study design, imprecise exposure and outcome assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to widespread exposure of HCW to SARS-CoV-2, workplaces in healthcare must be as safe as possible. Information from HCW can provide valuable insights into how infections spread, into direct and indirect health effects and into how effectively counter-measures mitigate adverse health outcomes. However, available research disallows to judge which counter-measure(s) of a current 'mix' should be prioritised for HCW. To arrive at evidence-based cost-effective prevention strategies, more well-conceived studies on the effectiveness of counter-measures are needed.

摘要

目的

新冠疫情对职业医学和公共卫生提出了要求。医护人员(HCWs)在前线抗击 SARS-CoV-2 的影响,我们必须通过全面的风险评估、评估和有效实施对策来创造安全的工作环境。我们提出以下问题:“关于 COVID-19 相关的工作场所健康风险,目前的文献报道了哪些内容?”和“目前的研究报告了哪些已实施预防措施的有效性?”

方法

作为早期 HCW 研究的一个快照,我们于 2020 年 4 月 26 日在三个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science 和 PsycInfo)中进行了一项关于与医疗保健相关工作场所的 COVID-19 相关健康结果和预防措施的快速系统文献检索。

结果

确定了 27 项研究与探索感染风险相关,11 项研究评估了预防措施。这些研究描述了 SARS-CoV-2 对 HCW 的健康和福祉产生了重大影响,不仅通过感染(n=6),而且还从心理健康的角度(n=16)。有 4 项研究报告了间接风险,如皮肤损伤,有一项研究描述了由于使用个人防护设备而导致头痛。很少有研究提供关于预防策略有效性的信息。总体而言,大多数关于健康风险以及预防措施有效性的研究质量为中低水平;这主要是由于研究设计的限制、暴露和结果评估的不精确性。

结论

由于 HCW 广泛接触 SARS-CoV-2,医疗保健场所必须尽可能安全。来自 HCW 的信息可以提供有价值的见解,了解感染如何传播、直接和间接的健康影响以及预防措施如何有效减轻不良健康结果。然而,现有的研究无法判断当前“混合”中的哪些对策应该优先考虑 HCW。为了制定基于证据的具有成本效益的预防策略,需要进行更多关于预防措施有效性的精心设计研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7042/7818819/cde74cf8e892/bmjopen-2020-042270f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验