• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电动自行车和传统自行车相关的创伤性脑损伤患者就诊于急诊科。

E-bike and classic bicycle-related traumatic brain injuries presenting to the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands

Department of Emergency Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2021 Apr;38(4):279-284. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208811. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2019-208811
PMID:33472871
Abstract

BACKGROUND

E-bike usage is increasingly popular and concerns about e-bike-related injuries and safety have risen as more injured e-bikers attend the emergency department (ED). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the main cause of severe morbidity and mortality in bicycle-related accidents. This study compares the frequency and severity of TBI after an accident with an e-bike or classic bicycle among patients treated in the ED.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of patients with bicycle-related injuries attending the ED of a level 1 trauma centre in the Netherlands between June 2016 and May 2017. The primary outcomes were frequency and severity of TBI (defined by the Abbreviated Injury Scale head score ≥1). Injury Severity Score, surgical intervention, hospitalisation and 30-day mortality were secondary outcomes. Independent risk factors for TBI were identified with multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

We included 834 patients, of whom there were 379 e-bike and 455 classic bicycle users. The frequency of TBI was not significantly different between the e-bike and classic bicycle group (respectively, n=56, 15% vs n=73, 16%; p=0.61). After adjusting for age, gender, velocity, anticoagulation use and alcohol intoxication the OR for TBI with an e-bike compared with classic bicycle was 0.90 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.45). Independent of type of bicycle, TBI was more likely if velocity was 26-45 km/hour, OR 8.14 (95% CI 2.36 to 28.08), the patient was highly alcohol intoxicated, OR 7.02 (95% CI 2.88 to 17.08) or used anticoagulants, OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.20 to 3.97). TBI severity was similar in both groups (p=0.65): eight e-bike and seven classic bicycle accident victims had serious TBI.

CONCLUSION

The frequency and severity of TBI among patients treated for bicycle-related injuries at our ED was similar for e-bike and classic bicycle users. Velocity, alcohol intoxication and anticoagulant use were the main determinants of the risk of head injury regardless of type of bicycle used.

摘要

背景

随着越来越多的电动自行车骑手前往急诊科(ED),人们对电动自行车相关伤害和安全问题的担忧也与日俱增。电动自行车相关事故中创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是导致严重发病率和死亡率的主要原因。本研究比较了在 ED 接受治疗的电动自行车或经典自行车相关事故患者 TBI 的发生频率和严重程度。

方法

这是一项在荷兰一级创伤中心 ED 接受治疗的自行车相关损伤患者的前瞻性队列研究。主要结局为 TBI 的发生频率和严重程度(定义为简明损伤量表头部评分≥1)。损伤严重程度评分、手术干预、住院和 30 天死亡率为次要结局。采用多因素逻辑回归识别 TBI 的独立危险因素。

结果

我们纳入了 834 名患者,其中电动自行车患者 379 名,经典自行车患者 455 名。电动自行车和经典自行车组 TBI 的发生率无显著差异(分别为 56 例,15%;73 例,16%;p=0.61)。在校正年龄、性别、速度、抗凝药物使用和酒精中毒后,电动自行车组 TBI 的 OR 为 0.90(95%CI 0.56 至 1.45)。与自行车类型无关,如果速度为 26-45km/h,TBI 的发生风险更高,OR 8.14(95%CI 2.36 至 28.08);患者高度酒精中毒,OR 7.02(95%CI 2.88 至 17.08);或使用抗凝药物,OR 2.18(95%CI 1.20 至 3.97),TBI 的发生风险也更高。两组 TBI 的严重程度相似(p=0.65):8 名电动自行车和 7 名经典自行车事故受害者有严重 TBI。

结论

在我们 ED 接受治疗的自行车相关损伤患者中,电动自行车和经典自行车使用者 TBI 的发生频率和严重程度相似。速度、酒精中毒和抗凝药物使用是无论使用何种自行车,导致头部受伤风险的主要决定因素。

相似文献

1
E-bike and classic bicycle-related traumatic brain injuries presenting to the emergency department.电动自行车和传统自行车相关的创伤性脑损伤患者就诊于急诊科。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Apr;38(4):279-284. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208811. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Comparison of the Incidence and Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury Caused by Electrical Bicycle and Bicycle Accidents-A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Swiss Level I Trauma Center.电动自行车和自行车事故导致创伤性脑损伤发生率和严重程度的比较——瑞士一级创伤中心的回顾性队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e1023-e1034. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
3
Injuries related to bicycle accidents: an epidemiological study in The Netherlands.自行车事故相关损伤:荷兰的一项流行病学研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):413-418. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1033-5. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
4
Bicycle-related injuries in the emergency department: a comparison between E-bikes and conventional bicycles: a prospective observational study.急诊科的自行车相关损伤:电动自行车与传统自行车的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1853-1860. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01366-5. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
5
Maxillofacial Fractures in Electric and Conventional Bicycle-Related Accidents.颌面骨折与电动和传统自行车事故相关。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Aug;80(8):1361-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.03.020. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
Bicycle helmets are highly protective against traumatic brain injury within a dense urban setting.在人口密集的城市环境中,自行车头盔对预防创伤性脑损伤具有高度保护作用。
Injury. 2015 Dec;46(12):2483-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.030. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Incidence and costs of bicycle-related traumatic brain injuries in the Netherlands.荷兰自行车相关创伤性脑损伤的发病率及成本
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Aug;81:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 May 6.
8
[E-bikers are more often seriously injured in bicycle accidents: results from the Groningen bicycle accident database].[电动自行车骑行者在自行车事故中更常受重伤:格罗宁根自行车事故数据库的结果]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161:D1520.
9
Related risk factors for injury severity of e-bike and bicycle crashes in Hefei.与合肥市电动自行车和自行车事故严重程度相关的危险因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(3):319-23. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.817669.
10
Bicycle-related injuries among children treated in US emergency departments, 2006-2015.2006-2015 年美国急诊部门治疗的儿童与自行车相关的伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
E-Scooters and Craniofacial Trauma: A Systematic Review.电动滑板车与颅面创伤:一项系统综述
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2023 Sep;16(3):245-253. doi: 10.1177/19433875221118790. Epub 2022 Aug 10.