Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Toho University Omori Medical Center.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine.
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2021 Jan;253(1):61-68. doi: 10.1620/tjem.253.61.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), an incurable lung disease of unknown cause, often presents with losses of skeletal muscle mass. IPF requires comprehensive care, but it has not been investigated which skeletal muscle mass index reflects holistic management factors: pulmonary function, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and physical performance. We compared three representative indices of skeletal muscle mass with holistic management factors in IPF patients. Twenty-seven mild to severe IPF patients (21 male) with the mean age of 76.1 ± 5.9 years were enrolled. The three indices were appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), cross-sectional area of pectoralis major (PM), and cross-sectional area of erector spinae muscles (ESM). ASMI is considered as a gold standard for sarcopenia assessment, while PM and ESM are frequently used in IPF. As PROs, we assessed breathlessness with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), symptoms with the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT), and health-related quality of life with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). For physical performance, peripheral muscle strength and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) were investigated. In this cross-sectional study, ASMI showed the greatest number of significantly correlated indices, such as pulmonary function, peripheral muscle strength, 6MWD, mMRC, and SGRQ. PM showed the next greatest number of correlations, with peripheral muscle strength, 6MWD, and mMRC, whereas ESM showed no significant correlations with any index. Thus, ASMI correlated with both PROs and physical performance, and PM correlated mainly with physical performance. In conclusion, assessing ASMI is helpful for the comprehensive care of patients with IPF.
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是一种病因不明的不可治愈的肺部疾病,常伴有骨骼肌量的减少。IPF 需要综合治疗,但尚未研究哪种骨骼肌质量指数能反映整体管理因素,如肺功能、患者报告的结局(PROs)和身体表现。我们比较了三种代表性的骨骼肌质量指数与 IPF 患者的整体管理因素。共纳入 27 名轻至重度 IPF 患者(21 名男性),平均年龄为 76.1±5.9 岁。这三个指数分别为四肢骨骼肌质量指数(ASMI)、胸大肌横截面积(PM)和竖脊肌横截面积(ESM)。ASMI 被认为是肌少症评估的金标准,而 PM 和 ESM 常用于 IPF。作为 PROs,我们使用改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)评估呼吸困难,使用慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)评估症状,使用圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评估健康相关生活质量。对于身体表现,我们研究了外周肌肉力量和 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)。在这项横断面研究中,ASMI 与肺功能、外周肌肉力量、6MWD、mMRC 和 SGRQ 等指标的相关性最大。PM 与外周肌肉力量、6MWD 和 mMRC 的相关性次之,而 ESM 与任何指标均无显著相关性。因此,ASMI 与 PROs 和身体表现均相关,而 PM 主要与身体表现相关。总之,评估 ASMI 有助于对 IPF 患者进行全面治疗。