Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Health Discovery Building 7.802, 1601 Trinity St, Bldg B, Z0900, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Department of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;40(7):2921-2925. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05594-x. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
To implement and evaluate an intervention using education and clinical decision support (CDS) to improve the quality of positive ANA referrals. We retrospectively reviewed "positive ANA" referrals from April 2017 to May 2019. Demographic data and referring provider's location were recorded. Final diagnoses were categorized into two groups: rheumatic disease (RD) or no RD. We compared pre- and post-intervention groups for each type of referral. The positive predictive value (PPV) of an ANA referral leading to an RD for each referral group was calculated. Our intervention consisted of an educational poster and CDS which included a hard-stop prompt embedded into the electronic ANA order. All internal subgroups received CDS; only the main campus primary care providers (IPCP) received the educational poster. The external (EXT) referral subgroup did not receive either intervention. We found a significant increase in the number of RDs diagnosed post-intervention (p = 0.007). The PPV for all referrals increased from 16% to 26% during this project. All groups demonstrated improvement in PPV except the EXT group, which showed no change. Subgroups which demonstrated significant increase in the diagnosis of RD included total internal (p = 0.0005), internal PCP (p = 0.002), and affiliated primary care providers (p = 0.0002). The IPCP subgroup additionally received the educational intervention and did not demonstrate significant improvement. Implementing an intervention with a CDS component helps improve the quality of positive ANA referrals to rheumatology. Key Points • Clinical decision support improves the quality of positive ANA referrals. • Incorporating clinical decision support within the ANA order of an EHR is an effective way to deliver information to impact ordering at the "point of care."
为了提高抗核抗体(ANA)阳性转诊的质量,我们采用教育和临床决策支持(CDS)实施并评估了一项干预措施。我们回顾性分析了 2017 年 4 月至 2019 年 5 月的“ANA 阳性”转诊。记录了人口统计学数据和转诊医生的位置。最终诊断分为两组:风湿性疾病(RD)或非 RD。我们比较了干预前后的每一种转诊类型。计算了每个转诊组中 ANA 阳性转诊导致 RD 的阳性预测值(PPV)。我们的干预措施包括教育海报和 CDS,其中包括嵌入电子 ANA 医嘱中的硬停止提示。所有内部亚组都接受了 CDS;只有主校区的初级保健医生(IPCP)收到了教育海报。外部(EXT)转诊亚组未接受任何干预。我们发现干预后诊断为 RD 的数量显著增加(p = 0.007)。在此项目期间,所有转诊的 PPV 从 16%增加到 26%。除 EXT 组外,所有组的 PPV 均有所改善,EXT 组无变化。RD 诊断数量显著增加的亚组包括:所有内部(p = 0.0005)、内部 PCP(p = 0.002)和附属初级保健医生(p = 0.0002)。IPCP 亚组还接受了教育干预,但并未显著改善。实施包含 CDS 组件的干预措施有助于提高 ANA 阳性转诊至风湿病科的质量。关键点:• 临床决策支持可提高 ANA 阳性转诊的质量。• 在电子病历的 ANA 医嘱中纳入临床决策支持是一种在“护理点”向医嘱者提供信息的有效方法。