• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在疫情期间,透明的科学报告至关重要。

Transparent scientific reporting is imperative during the pandemic.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy and Health Care, Tajen University, Pingtung, Taiwan.

Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Pathog Glob Health. 2021 May;115(3):135-136. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1878448. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1080/20477724.2021.1878448
PMID:33475047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8079007/
Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has exposed not only the lack of preparation to combat the deadly disease, but also the nature of response by governments worldwide. This article analyses how some governments suppress science reporting in the Asia Pacific region during the pandemic. It also highlights how the political interference in science undermines liability and openness leading to the lack of freedom to express facts honestly.

摘要

冠状病毒大流行不仅暴露了应对这种致命疾病的准备不足,也暴露了世界各国政府的应对性质。本文分析了一些亚太地区的政府在疫情期间如何压制科学报道。它还强调了政治干预科学如何破坏责任和透明度,导致缺乏诚实表达事实的自由。

相似文献

1
Transparent scientific reporting is imperative during the pandemic.在疫情期间,透明的科学报告至关重要。
Pathog Glob Health. 2021 May;115(3):135-136. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1878448. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
COVID-19 Is a Crisis in Planetary Health and Politics of Expertise: Time to Think Critically and Innovate Both.COVID-19 是一场行星健康和专业知识政治的危机:是时候批判性地思考和创新了。
OMICS. 2021 May;25(5):279-284. doi: 10.1089/omi.2021.0038.
3
The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses.新冠疫情下的比较政治学:理解政府应对措施的必要性。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1413-1416. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1783340. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Politics and pandemics.政治与大流行病。
Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1131-1140. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1947601.
5
Efficiency in the governance of the Covid-19 pandemic: political and territorial factors.新冠疫情治理中的效率:政治和地域因素
Global Health. 2021 Sep 21;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00759-4.
6
Immunitarianism: defence and sacrifice in the politics of Covid-19.免疫主义:新冠政治中的防御与牺牲。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Feb 22;43(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00384-9.
7
Democracy, Capacity, and Coercion in Pandemic Response: COVID-19 in Comparative Political Perspective.疫情应对中的民主、能力与强制:比较政治视角下的 COVID-19。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Dec 1;45(6):997-1012. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8641530.
8
Trust and transparency in times of crisis: Results from an online survey during the first wave (April 2020) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK.信任与透明度在危机时期:英国 COVID-19 疫情第一波(2020 年 4 月)期间在线调查结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0239247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239247. eCollection 2021.
9
A thematic study: impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rare disease organisations and patients across ten jurisdictions in the Asia Pacific region.主题研究:COVID-19 大流行对亚太地区十个司法管辖区的罕见病组织和患者的影响。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Mar 5;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01766-9.
10
The novel coronavirus outbreak: what can be learned from China in public reporting?新型冠状病毒疫情:从中国的公开报告中可以学到什么?
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Mar 9;5:9. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00140-9. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19: politicisation, "corruption," and suppression of science.新冠疫情:政治化、“腐败”与对科学的压制。
BMJ. 2020 Nov 13;371:m4425. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4425.
2
China is tightening its grip on coronavirus research.中国正在加强对冠状病毒研究的管控。
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7804):439-440. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01108-y.
3
Scientists in Indonesia fear political interference.印度尼西亚的科学家担心受到政治干预。
Science. 2020 Feb 14;367(6479):722-723. doi: 10.1126/science.367.6479.722.
4
Toxic metals in ayurvedic preparations from a public health lead poisoning cluster investigation.基于公共卫生铅中毒聚集性调查的阿育吠陀制剂中的有毒金属
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2017 Jul;23(3):187-192. doi: 10.1080/10773525.2018.1447880. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
A glimpse of Ayurveda - The forgotten history and principles of Indian traditional medicine.阿育吠陀一瞥——印度传统医学被遗忘的历史与原则。
J Tradit Complement Med. 2016 Feb 28;7(1):50-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.02.002. eCollection 2017 Jan.
6
Are Indian yoga trials more likely to be positive than those from other countries? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.与其他国家的试验相比,印度的瑜伽试验更有可能得出阳性结果吗?一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:269-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
7
Scientists and the integrity of research.科学家与研究的诚信
Science. 1994 Dec 9;266(5191):1660-1. doi: 10.1126/science.7992048.