Suppr超能文献

腰椎管狭窄症的小关节突保留减压:微创双侧交叉入路。

Facet-Sparing Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: The Minimally Invasive Bilateral Crossover Approach.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2021 May;82(3):278-284. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718521. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECTIVE

One risk of established decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis is the resection of facet joints, especially if they are steeply configured, promoting destabilization. aims to preserve the facet joints and thus stability of the spine. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and early results of this technique.

METHODS

This retrospective case series includes 10 consecutive patients with lumbar stenosis and steep-angle (<35 degrees) facet joints who were treated with minimally invasive bilateral crossover decompression. Eleven segments were decompressed, most commonly L3/L4 (63.6%), followed by L1/L2 and L2/L3 (18.2% each). The effectiveness of surgical decompression was assessed by self-reporting questionnaires.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of 10.5 months, the Symptom Severity Scale and Physical Function Scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire improved by 0.9 ( < 0.05) and 0.7 points, respectively. The mean Oswestry Disability Index improved from 53.9 to 34.6 ( < 0.05). Local and radiating pain under strain showed statistically significant improvement on the Visual Analog Scale (8.9 vs. 5.0 and 8.4 vs. 4.6, respectively). Maximum walking distance increased from 190 to 1,029 m. Apart from one patient requiring surgical decompression of an adjacent segment, there were no reoperations, neurological deteriorations, or other complications.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate is a promising technique for the treatment of spinal canal stenosis. With its design to spare facet joints, it can potentially reduce the risk of spinal instability, especially in patients with steep facet joints.

摘要

背景与研究目的

腰椎管狭窄症减压技术的一个风险是切除关节突关节,尤其是关节突关节陡峭(<35 度)时,会促进失稳。旨在保留关节突关节,从而维持脊柱的稳定性。本研究旨在展示该技术的可行性和早期结果。

方法

本回顾性病例系列纳入 10 例腰椎管狭窄且关节突关节陡峭角(<35 度)的连续患者,采用微创双侧交叉减压治疗。共减压 11 个节段,最常见的是 L3/L4(63.6%),其次是 L1/L2 和 L2/L3(各 18.2%)。通过自我报告问卷评估手术减压的效果。

结果

随访 10.5 个月后,瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷的症状严重程度评分和躯体功能评分分别改善了 0.9(<0.05)和 0.7 分,Oswestry 功能障碍指数平均从 53.9 分改善至 34.6 分(<0.05)。在应变下,局部和放射痛的视觉模拟量表评分分别从 8.9 分改善至 5.0 分和 8.4 分改善至 4.6 分,具有统计学意义。最大步行距离从 190 米增加至 1029 米。除 1 例患者需要对相邻节段进行手术减压外,无再次手术、神经恶化或其他并发症。

结论

本研究结果表明对于椎管狭窄症的治疗,是一种有前途的技术。该技术保留了关节突关节,可能降低脊柱不稳的风险,尤其是在关节突关节陡峭的患者中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验