Zuna R E, Mitchell M L
Department of Pathology, State University of New York at Stony Brook 11794-7025.
Acta Cytol. 1988 Mar-Apr;32(2):139-47.
In order to define the problems in the interpretation of peritoneal washing cytology specimens, 149 benign cases were examined retrospectively and the cytologies compared with the correlating histologies. There were problems in the cytologic interpretation on blind review in 18 cases (12.1%). Difficulties in interpretation of peritoneal washing cytology included conditions associated with (1) mesothelial reactions and adhesion formation, (2) rupture of cystic structures, (3) fallopian tube epithelium and (4) combinations of these factors. It is anticipated that familiarity with these problems will enhance accuracy in peritoneal washing cytology, particularly in those cases in which a malignancy is present but has not penetrated into the peritoneal cavity.
为了明确腹膜冲洗细胞学标本解读中的问题,我们回顾性检查了149例良性病例,并将细胞学检查结果与相关组织学结果进行了比较。在盲法评估中,有18例(12.1%)存在细胞学解读问题。腹膜冲洗细胞学解读的困难包括与以下情况相关的状况:(1)间皮反应和粘连形成;(2)囊性结构破裂;(3)输卵管上皮;以及(4)这些因素的组合。预计熟悉这些问题将提高腹膜冲洗细胞学的准确性,特别是在存在恶性肿瘤但尚未侵入腹膜腔的病例中。