Suppr超能文献

新生儿残余标本研究的电子知情同意信息:来自不同人群焦点小组的结果

Electronic informed consent information for residual newborn specimen research: findings from focus groups with diverse populations.

作者信息

Frost Caren J, Johnson Erin P, Witte Brieanne, Stark Louisa, Botkin Jeff, Rothwell Erin

机构信息

College of Social Work, University of Utah, 395 E 1500 S, room 229A, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2021 Jan;12(1):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00496-y. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Abstract

We developed a video and an app for obtaining consent about allowing newborn blood spots (NBS) to be used as biospecimen resources for biobanking. Newborn screening programs test for treatable diseases and leave residual biospecimens that can be used in future research activities. We conducted focus groups and interviews with three diverse communities to determine (a) how well the consent tools worked and (b) participant familiarity with NBS. Participants preferred the video and noted that they were unaware that NBS could be used for future research. Providing information about how biospecimens could be used was a key issue.

摘要

我们开发了一个视频和一款应用程序,用于获取关于允许将新生儿血斑用作生物样本库的生物样本资源的同意书。新生儿筛查项目检测可治疗疾病,并留下可用于未来研究活动的剩余生物样本。我们对三个不同社区进行了焦点小组讨论和访谈,以确定:(a)同意工具的效果如何;(b)参与者对新生儿血斑的熟悉程度。参与者更喜欢该视频,并指出他们不知道新生儿血斑可用于未来研究。提供关于生物样本如何使用的信息是一个关键问题。

相似文献

1
Electronic informed consent information for residual newborn specimen research: findings from focus groups with diverse populations.
J Community Genet. 2021 Jan;12(1):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00496-y. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Comparison of Video, App, and Standard Consent Processes on Decision-Making for Biospecimen Research: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):252-260. doi: 10.1177/1556264620913455. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
Public attitudes regarding the use of residual newborn screening specimens for research.
Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):231-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0970. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
4
An Assessment of a Shortened Consent Form for the Storage and Research Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Spots.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Dec;12(5):335-342. doi: 10.1177/1556264617736199. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
6
Informed consent for biobanking research: cancer patient recruitment from rural communities in Maine.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2013 Apr;11(2):107-14. doi: 10.1089/bio.2012.0054.
8
Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women.
J Community Genet. 2016 Jan;7(1):41-9. doi: 10.1007/s12687-015-0248-y. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
9
Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening?
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2010 Dec;20(4):299-328.
10
Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731H.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review.
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 21;23(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00849-x.
2
Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 1;9:724431. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.724431. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Video, App, and Standard Consent Processes on Decision-Making for Biospecimen Research: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):252-260. doi: 10.1177/1556264620913455. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
Inclusion of special populations in clinical research: important considerations and guidelines.
J Clin Transl Res. 2018 Apr 7;4(1):56-69. eCollection 2018 May 28.
3
Secondary research uses of residual newborn screening dried bloodspots: a scoping review.
Genet Med. 2019 Jul;21(7):1469-1475. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0387-8. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
"I don't want to be Henrietta Lacks": diverse patient perspectives on donating biospecimens for precision medicine research.
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):107-113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0032-6. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
5
Universal state newborn screening programs can reduce health disparities.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jan;169(1):7-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2465.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验