Andtfolk Malin, Nyholm Linda, Eide Hilde, Fagerström Lisbeth
Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Department of Caring Science, Åbo Akademi University, Vaasa, Finland.
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Science Centre Health and Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Assist Technol. 2022 Sep 3;34(5):518-526. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1880493. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
The aim was to examine how humanoid robots have been used in the care of older persons and identify possible benefits and challenges associated with such use from older persons' points of view. The study was a scoping review based on Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. To identify peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature, a systematic search of the PubMed, Cinahl and Google Scholar electronic databases was conducted for studies published between 2013 and 2019. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines have served as a guideline. A total of 12 studies were included and resulted in four main categories related to how humanoid robots have been used in care of older persons (domain of use): Supports everyday life, Provides interaction, Facilitates cognitive training and Facilitates physical training. Potential for humanoid robots to be accepted as companions for older persons was seen, but technical issues, such as humanoid robots' slow response time or errors, emerged as key challenges. Older persons' perceived enjoyment of using a humanoid robot might also decrease over time. Validated measurements to estimate the effectiveness of using humanoid robots in the care of older persons are needed.
目的是研究类人机器人如何用于老年人护理,并从老年人的角度确定与此类使用相关的可能益处和挑战。该研究是基于阿克西和奥马利的方法框架进行的范围综述。为了识别经过同行评审和非同行评审的文献,对2013年至2019年发表的研究在PubMed、Cinahl和谷歌学术电子数据库中进行了系统检索。PRISMA-ScR指南作为指导方针。共纳入12项研究,结果分为与类人机器人如何用于老年人护理相关的四个主要类别(使用领域):支持日常生活、提供互动、促进认知训练和促进体育锻炼。类人机器人有被老年人接受为陪伴者的潜力,但技术问题,如类人机器人的响应时间缓慢或出现错误,成为关键挑战。随着时间的推移,老年人使用类人机器人的感知乐趣也可能会降低。需要经过验证的测量方法来评估类人机器人在老年人护理中的使用效果。