Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0244932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244932. eCollection 2021.
Urbanization is among the largest threats to wildlife populations through factors such as fragmentation, isolation, and habitat destruction. Urban open spaces, such as parks and golf courses, have the potential to provide wildlife with suitable habitat within an urbanized matrix. These refugia may be particularly important for amphibians, which represent one of the most endangered and least vagile vertebrate groups on earth. During the spring and summer of 2018, we conducted surveys to determine the presence of anurans at 51 wetland sites within the Piedmont ecoregion of South Carolina. Nearly one-third of these wetlands were located within urban open spaces, one-third in low development areas, and one-third in highly developed areas. Impervious surface and total road length surrounding the wetlands were measured at two scales, a core habitat scale (300 m) and average maximum migration scale (750 m), and we measured several within-wetland habitat variables. Urban Open Space wetlands had levels of surrounding impervious surface similar to High Urbanization wetlands at the larger scale and were intermediate between Low and High Urbanization wetlands at the smaller scale. The total length of road segments occurring within buffers (at both scales) surrounding our study wetlands was higher for Urban Open Space compared to Low and High Urbanization sites. Among the within-wetland variables measured, Low Urbanization sites had higher canopy cover and were more likely to have a terrestrial buffer zone relative to the other categories. Species richness decreased significantly as total road length increased among all wetlands. Wetland category was not a significant driver explaining species richness, but β-diversity was more variable among Urban Open Space wetlands than either Low or High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands did not appear to increase suitability for anurans relative to High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands had higher variability in species composition, which was perhaps attributable to the diversity among sites represented in the Urban Open Space category.
城市化是对野生动物种群的最大威胁之一,其影响因素包括破碎化、隔离和生境破坏。城市开放空间,如公园和高尔夫球场,有潜力在城市化基质内为野生动物提供适宜的栖息地。这些避难所对于两栖动物来说可能尤为重要,因为它们是地球上最濒危和最不擅长迁徙的脊椎动物之一。2018 年春夏两季,我们在南卡罗来纳州皮埃蒙特生态区的 51 个湿地地点进行了调查,以确定有多少无尾目动物存在。这些湿地中近三分之一位于城市开放空间内,三分之一位于低开发区域,三分之一位于高度开发区域。我们在两个尺度上测量了湿地周围的不透水表面和总道路长度,一个是核心栖息地尺度(300 米),另一个是平均最大迁移尺度(750 米),并测量了几个湿地内的生境变量。在较大尺度上,城市开放空间湿地周围的不透水表面水平与高度城市化湿地相似,而在较小尺度上则介于低城市化和高度城市化湿地之间。在环绕我们研究湿地的缓冲区(在两个尺度上)内发生的道路段总长度,城市开放空间的要高于低城市化和高城市化的地点。在所测量的湿地内变量中,低城市化地点的树冠覆盖度更高,与其他类别相比,更有可能有一个陆地缓冲区。所有湿地中,随着总道路长度的增加,物种丰富度显著下降。湿地类别并不是解释物种丰富度的重要驱动因素,但β多样性在城市开放空间湿地中比在低城市化或高城市化湿地中更为多变。城市开放空间湿地似乎并没有比高度城市化湿地更适合无尾目动物。城市开放空间湿地的物种组成变化较大,这可能归因于城市开放空间类别中所代表的各地点之间的多样性。