Suppr超能文献

保守治疗男性尿道硬化性苔藓狭窄:多机构经验。

Conservative Management of Lichen Sclerosus Male Urethral Strictures: A Multi-Institutional Experience.

机构信息

Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.

Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.

出版信息

Urology. 2021 Jun;152:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes and safety of conservative management of lichen sclerosus urethral stricture disease (LS-USD).

METHODS

This multi-institutional study included patients with LS-USD managed with endoscopic procedures or clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) regimens between 2005 and 2019. Those with an obliterative stricture, a history of prior urethral reconstruction, or <3 months follow-up was excluded. Primary outcome measures were urinary tract infection (UTI), acute urinary retention (AUR), serum creatinine, and uroflowmetry values. Secondary outcome measures included patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires on urinary and sexual function. Failure was defined as progression to reconstructive surgery or permanent indwelling catheterization.

RESULTS

112 men were analyzed with a median follow-up of 30.0 months (IQR 12.0-55.5). Median age was 52.5 years (IQR 42.6-61.0) and median body mass index was 34.5 kg/m (IQR 29.9-40.7). Median stricture length was 12.0 cm (IQR 2.8-20.0). 89% of patients underwent urethral balloon dilation, with a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) per patient. CIC was performed in 46% of patients, with 31% of this subgroup using intraurethral steroids. 84% of patients avoided invasive surgery or permanent indwelling catheterization, with an improvement in urethral stricture patient-reported outcome measure scores (P = .0013). Those who failed were more likely to have a history of UTI (P = .04), urosepsis (P = .03), AUR (P <.001), and more likely to perform CIC (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Over medium-term follow-up, most patients with LS-USD were safely managed with conservative techniques. Caution is warranted in those who develop UTIs, urosepsis, and AUR and the potential long-term consequences of repetitive conservative interventions must be considered.

摘要

目的

评估硬化性苔藓尿道狭窄疾病(LS-USD)的保守治疗的结果和安全性。

方法

这项多机构研究纳入了 2005 年至 2019 年期间接受内镜手术或间歇性清洁导尿(CIC)治疗的 LS-USD 患者。排除有闭塞性狭窄、既往尿道重建史或随访时间<3 个月的患者。主要观察指标为尿路感染(UTI)、急性尿潴留(AUR)、血清肌酐和尿流率值。次要观察指标包括尿功能和性功能的患者报告结局测量问卷。失败定义为进展为重建手术或永久性留置导尿管。

结果

分析了 112 名男性患者,中位随访时间为 30.0 个月(IQR 12.0-55.5)。中位年龄为 52.5 岁(IQR 42.6-61.0),中位体重指数为 34.5 kg/m(IQR 29.9-40.7)。中位狭窄长度为 12.0 cm(IQR 2.8-20.0)。89%的患者接受了尿道球囊扩张,每位患者的中位数为 2 次(IQR 1-3)。46%的患者行 CIC,其中 31%的患者使用尿道内类固醇。84%的患者避免了侵入性手术或永久性留置导尿管,尿道狭窄患者报告结局测量评分有所改善(P=.0013)。失败的患者更有可能有 UTI(P=.04)、菌血症(P=.03)、AUR 病史(P<.001),并且更有可能行 CIC(P=.01)。

结论

在中期随访中,大多数 LS-USD 患者采用保守技术安全治疗。对于发生 UTI、菌血症和 AUR 的患者需要谨慎,并应考虑重复保守干预的潜在长期后果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验