Suppr超能文献

回顾性分析儿童难治性癫痫患者行开放性手术与激光间质热疗胼胝体切开术的疗效。

Retrospective analysis of open surgical versus laser interstitial thermal therapy callosotomy in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy.

机构信息

Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.

2Neurology, Children's Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Jan 22;27(4):420-428. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.PEDS20167. Print 2021 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Corpus callosotomy remains an established surgical treatment for certain types of medically refractory epilepsy in pediatric patients. While the traditional surgical approach is often well tolerated, the advent of MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) provides a new opportunity to ablate the callosal body in a minimally invasive fashion and minimize the risks associated with an open interhemispheric approach. However, the literature is sparse regarding the comparative efficacy and safety profiles of open corpus callosotomy (OCC) and LITT callosotomy. To this end, the authors present a novel retrospective analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of these methods.

METHODS

Patients who underwent OCC and LITT callosotomy during the period from 2005 to 2018 were included in a single-center retrospective analysis. Patient demographic and procedural variables were collected, including length of stay, procedural blood loss, corticosteroid requirements, postsurgical complications, and postoperative disposition. Pre- and postoperative seizure frequency (according to seizure type) were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 19 patients, who underwent 24 interventions (16 OCC and 8 LITT), were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up durations for the OCC and LITT cohorts were 83.5 months and 12.3 months, respectively. Both groups experienced reduced frequencies of seizure and drop attack frequency postoperatively. Additionally, LITT callosotomy was associated with a significant decrease in estimated blood loss and decreased length of pediatric ICU stay, with a trend of shorter length of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer-term follow-up and a larger population are required to further delineate the comparative efficacies of LITT callosotomy and OCC for the treatment of pediatric medically refractory epilepsy. However, the authors' data demonstrate that LITT shows promise as a safe and effective alternative to OCC.

摘要

目的

胼胝体切开术仍然是小儿某些药物难治性癫痫的既定手术治疗方法。虽然传统的手术方法通常能很好地耐受,但磁共振引导激光间质热疗(LITT)的出现为以微创方式消融胼胝体并最大限度地降低开颅半球间入路相关风险提供了新的机会。然而,关于开放性胼胝体切开术(OCC)和 LITT 胼胝体切开术的比较疗效和安全性的文献很少。为此,作者提出了一项比较这两种方法疗效和安全性的新回顾性分析。

方法

回顾性分析了 2005 年至 2018 年期间接受 OCC 和 LITT 胼胝体切开术的患者。收集了患者的人口统计学和手术变量,包括住院时间、手术失血量、皮质类固醇需求、术后并发症和术后转归。记录术前和术后的癫痫发作频率(根据癫痫发作类型)。

结果

共有 19 名患者接受了 24 次干预(16 次 OCC 和 8 次 LITT),包括在分析中。OCC 和 LITT 两组的平均随访时间分别为 83.5 个月和 12.3 个月。两组患者术后癫痫发作和跌倒发作频率均降低。此外,LITT 胼胝体切开术与估计失血量显著减少和儿科 ICU 住院时间缩短有关,住院时间缩短的趋势更为明显。

结论

需要更长时间的随访和更大的人群来进一步阐明 LITT 胼胝体切开术和 OCC 治疗小儿药物难治性癫痫的比较疗效。然而,作者的数据表明,LITT 作为 OCC 的安全有效的替代方法具有很大的潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验