• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让我们更个人化:学术办公室的展示与性别。

Let's Get Personal: Academic Office Displays and Gender.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Perm J. 2020 Sep;24:1-6. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.237.

DOI:10.7812/TPP/19.237
PMID:33482932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7849275/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Differential standards in academic medicine based on gender have been described for self-promoting behavior.

BACKGROUND

Objective: To explore differences in office display of professional and personal items between male and female academic physicians as a proxy for self-promotion.

METHODS

A university hospital's faculty was invited to participate in a study on office setup. Participants were blinded to the study aim. Investigators evaluated offices to assess the number of professional and personal displays. De-identified data on participant characteristics and office physical characteristics were recorded. Correlations with the number of items displayed were analyzed by univariable and multivariable Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Forty-eight physicians participated: 23 (47.9%) from emergency medicine, 9 (18.8%) from surgery, and 16 (33.3%) from internal medicine. The median number of professional displays was 5.0 for women (interquartile range [IQR] = 3.0-9.0) and 6.0 for men (IQR = 2.0-12.0). Controlling for specialty and academic rank, no significant difference existed in professional display rates by women (incidence rate ratio = 1.1, 95% confidence interval = 0.8-1.4). The median number of personal displays was 14.5 items for women (IQR = 8.0-25.0) and 6.0 items for men (IQR = 3.0-15.0), with a significantly different rate (incidence rate ratio = 1.4, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-1.7) when we controlled for specialty, generation, rank, and office characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Women displayed more personal items than did men, with no difference in professional display rates. Future studies should examine this difference to understand its cause, which may be linked to differences in academic promotion between men and women.

摘要

介绍

性别差异在学术医学中已被描述为自我推销的行为。

背景

目的:通过研究学术医师办公室的专业和个人物品展示来探索其性别差异,以此作为自我推销的代理指标。

方法

邀请一家大学医院的全体教员参加一项办公室布置的研究。参与者对研究目的一无所知。调查人员评估了办公室以评估专业和个人展示物品的数量。记录参与者特征和办公室物理特征的匿名数据。使用单变量和多变量泊松回归分析与物品数量显示的相关性。

结果

共有 48 名医师参与:23 名(47.9%)来自急诊医学,9 名(18.8%)来自外科,16 名(33.3%)来自内科。女性的专业展示中位数为 5.0(四分位距[IQR] = 3.0-9.0),男性为 6.0(IQR = 2.0-12.0)。控制专业和学术级别后,女性的专业展示率没有显著差异(发病率比=1.1,95%置信区间=0.8-1.4)。女性的个人展示中位数为 14.5 项(IQR = 8.0-25.0),男性为 6.0 项(IQR = 3.0-15.0),控制专业、代际、级别和办公室特征后,差异有统计学意义(发病率比=1.4,95%置信区间=1.2-1.7)。

结论

女性比男性展示更多的个人物品,但专业展示率没有差异。未来的研究应该进一步探究这种差异的原因,其可能与男女学术晋升之间的差异有关。

相似文献

1
Let's Get Personal: Academic Office Displays and Gender.让我们更个人化:学术办公室的展示与性别。
Perm J. 2020 Sep;24:1-6. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.237.
2
Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014.2014年美国医学院校学术排名中的性别差异。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1149-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10680.
3
Men Receive Three Times More Industry Payments than Women Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons, Even After Controlling for Confounding Variables.男性骨科医生的行业收入比女性同行高出三倍,即使在控制了混杂变量后也是如此。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1593-1599. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001132.
4
Association of Physician Characteristics With Perceptions and Experiences of Gender Equity in an Academic Internal Medicine Department.医生特征与学术内科部门性别平等感知和体验的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915165. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15165.
5
Sex Differences in Academic Productivity Across Academic Ranks and Specialties in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.学术医学中不同学术级别和专业的学术生产力中的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12404.
6
Career Advancement Among Women Physicians in Nine Academic Medicine Specialties.九大学医学专科领域的女性医师职业发展
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Oct;32(10):1073-1079. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0464. Epub 2023 May 15.
7
Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity?学术医学领域女性的薪酬与职业发展:是否存在公平?
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 3;141(3):205-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-3-200408030-00009.
8
Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor?促进女性医生在学术医学领域的发展。是玻璃天花板还是粘性地板?
JAMA. 1995 Apr 5;273(13):1022-5.
9
Gender differences in faculty rank among academic physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.学术医师职称中的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):e050322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050322.
10
Increasing Promotion of Women Faculty in Academic Medicine: Impact of National Career Development Programs.提高学术医学领域女性教职员工的比例:国家职业发展计划的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun;29(6):837-846. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8044. Epub 2020 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Eliminating Gender-Based Bias in Academic Medicine: More Than Naming the "Elephant in the Room".消除医学领域的性别偏见:不仅仅是指出“房间里的大象”。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):966-968. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4411-0. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
2
Narratives of Participants in National Career Development Programs for Women in Academic Medicine: Identifying the Opportunities for Strategic Investment.参与学术医学领域女性国家职业发展项目的参与者叙述:确定战略投资机会。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Apr;25(4):360-70. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5354. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?为什么约翰比詹妮弗更有可能成为系主任?
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:197-214.
4
Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers.高成就的青年医师研究者在育儿和家务上的时间投入的性别差异。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):344-53. doi: 10.7326/M13-0974.
5
Job stress across gender: the importance of emotional and intellectual demands and social support in women.跨性别工作压力:情绪和智力需求以及社会支持对女性的重要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jan 14;10(1):375-89. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10010375.
6
Medication errors in the emergency department: a systems approach to minimizing risk.急诊科的用药错误:一种将风险降至最低的系统方法。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003 Feb;21(1):141-58. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(02)00085-8.
7
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.对女性领导者偏见的角色一致性理论。
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):573-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573.
8
Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine.教员对学术医学领域性别歧视和性骚扰的看法。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jun 6;132(11):889-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00007.