Suppr超能文献

学术医师职称中的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Gender differences in faculty rank among academic physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):e050322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050322.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many studies have analysed gender bias in academic medicine; however, no comprehensive synthesis of the literature has been performed. We conducted a pooled analysis of the difference in the proportion of men versus women with full professorship among academic physicians.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Education Resources Information Center and PsycINFO were searched from inception to 3 July 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

All original studies reporting faculty rank stratified by gender worldwide were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with a third author resolving discrepancies. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 5897 articles. 218 studies were included with 991 207 academic physician data points. Men were 2.77 times more likely to be full professors (182 271/643 790 men vs 30 349/251 501 women, OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.57 to 2.98). Although men practised for longer (median 18 vs 12 years, p<0.00002), the gender gap remained after pooling seven studies that adjusted for factors including time in practice, specialty, publications, h-index, additional PhD and institution (adjusted OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.20). Meta-regression by data collection year demonstrated improvement over time (p=0.0011); however, subgroup analysis showed that gender disparities remain significant in the 2010-2020 decade (OR 2.63, 95% CI 2.48 to 2.80). The gender gap was present across all specialties and both within and outside of North America. Men published more papers (mean difference 17.2, 95% CI 14.7 to 19.7), earned higher salaries (mean difference $33 256, 95% CI $25 969 to $40 542) and were more likely to be departmental chairs (OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Gender inequity in academic medicine exists across all specialties, geographical regions and multiple measures of success, including academic rank, publications, salary and leadership. Men are more likely than women to be full professors after controlling for experience, academic productivity and specialty. Although there has been some improvement over time, the gender disparity in faculty rank persists.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020197414.

摘要

目的

许多研究分析了学术医学中的性别偏见;然而,尚未对文献进行综合分析。我们对学术医师中拥有正教授职称的男性与女性比例进行了荟萃分析。

设计

系统综述和荟萃分析。

资料来源

从建库至 2020 年 7 月 3 日,我们在 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、教育资源信息中心和 PsycINFO 中进行了检索。

研究选择

纳入了全世界报告按性别分层教职的所有原始研究。

资料提取和合成

两名独立的评审员进行了研究筛选、数据提取和质量评估,第三位评审员解决了分歧。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

我们的检索结果为 5897 篇文章。纳入了 218 项研究,共纳入 991207 名学术医师的数据点。男性成为正教授的可能性是女性的 2.77 倍(182271/643790 名男性 vs 30349/251501 名女性,OR 2.77,95%CI 2.57 至 2.98)。尽管男性行医时间更长(中位数 18 年 vs 12 年,p<0.00002),但在纳入了包括行医时间、专业、出版物、h 指数、额外博士学位和机构等因素进行调整的 7 项研究中,性别差距仍然存在(调整后的 OR 1.83,95%CI 1.04 至 3.20)。按数据收集年份进行的荟萃回归分析表明,随着时间的推移情况有所改善(p=0.0011);然而,亚组分析显示,在 2010 年至 2020 年这十年中,性别差距仍然显著(OR 2.63,95%CI 2.48 至 2.80)。这种性别差距存在于所有专业领域,无论是在北美地区内外,都有体现。男性发表的论文更多(平均差异 17.2,95%CI 14.7 至 19.7),收入更高(平均差异 33256 美元,95%CI 25969 美元至 40542 美元),更有可能担任系主任(OR 2.61,95%CI 2.19 至 3.12)。

结论

在所有专业、地理区域和包括学术职称、出版物、薪酬和领导力在内的多项成功衡量标准中,学术医学中都存在性别不平等。在控制了经验、学术成果和专业后,男性成为正教授的可能性高于女性。尽管随着时间的推移有所改善,但教职人员的性别差距仍然存在。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020197414。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b583/8565568/50d44d228e9c/bmjopen-2021-050322f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验