University of Sheffield; Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
University of Sheffield.
Behav Ther. 2021 Jan;52(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 May 20.
Despite the vastly increased dissemination of the low-intensity (LI) version of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for the treatment of anxiety and depression, no valid and reliable indices of the LI-CBT clinical competencies currently exist. This research therefore sought to develop and evaluate two measures: the low-intensity assessment competency scale (LIAC) and the low-intensity treatment competency scale (LITC). Inductive and deductive methods were used to construct the competency scales and detailed rating manuals were prepared. Two studies were then completed. The first study used a quantitative, fully-crossed design and the second a multi-center, quantitative longitudinal design. In study one, novice, qualified, and expert LI-CBT practitioners rated an LI-CBT assessment session (using the LIAC) and an LI-CBT treatment session (using the LITC). Study two used the LIAC and LITC across four training sites to analyze the competencies of LI-CBT practitioners over time, across raters, and in relation to the actor/patients' feedback concerning helpfulness, the alliance, and willingness to return. Both the LIAC and LITC were found to be single factor scales with good internal, test-retest reliability and reasonable inter-rater reliability. Both measures were sensitive to measuring change in clinical competence. The LIAC had good concurrent, criterion, discriminant, and predictive validity, while the LITC had good concurrent, criterion, and predictive validity, but limited discriminant validity. A score of 18 accurately delineated a minimum level of competence in LI-CBT assessment and treatment practice, with incompetent practice associated with patient disengagement. These observational ratings scales can contribute to the clinical governance of the burgeoning use of LI-CBT interventions for anxiety and depression in routine services and also in the methods of controlled studies.
尽管针对焦虑和抑郁的低强度认知行为疗法(CBT)的传播范围大大扩大,但目前还没有有效的、可靠的低强度 CBT 临床能力的评估指标。因此,本研究旨在开发和评估两种量表:低强度评估能力量表(LIAC)和低强度治疗能力量表(LITC)。采用归纳和演绎的方法构建能力量表,并编制详细的评分手册。然后完成了两项研究。第一项研究采用定量、完全交叉设计,第二项研究采用多中心、定量纵向设计。在第一项研究中,新手、合格和专家级的低强度 CBT 从业者对低强度 CBT 评估(使用 LIAC)和低强度 CBT 治疗(使用 LITC)进行评分。第二项研究在四个培训地点使用 LIAC 和 LITC,分析低强度 CBT 从业者随时间推移、不同评分者以及与患者反馈的有用性、联盟和回归意愿相关的能力变化。LIAC 和 LITC 均被发现是单因素量表,具有良好的内部、重测信度和合理的评分者间信度。两种测量方法都能敏感地衡量临床能力的变化。LIAC 具有良好的同时性、标准性、区分性和预测性效度,而 LITC 具有良好的同时性、标准性和预测性效度,但区分性效度有限。18 分准确划定了低强度 CBT 评估和治疗实践的最低能力水平,不熟练的实践与患者脱离有关。这些观察性评分量表可以为常规服务中针对焦虑和抑郁的低强度 CBT 干预的蓬勃发展提供临床治理,也可以为对照研究的方法提供支持。