• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估惊恐障碍特异性能力:惊恐障碍认知治疗技能评定量表的评估。

Assessing panic disorder-specific competencies: evaluation of the Cognitive Therapy Competence Scale for panic disorder.

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2021 Mar;49(2):197-205. doi: 10.1017/S1352465820000612. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1017/S1352465820000612
PMID:32895086
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based treatment for panic disorder consists of disorder-specific cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) protocols. However, most measures of CBT competence are generic and there is a clear need for disorder-specific assessment measures.

AIMS

To fill this gap, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Therapy Competence Scale (CTCP) for panic disorder.

METHOD

CBT trainees (n = 60) submitted audio recordings of CBT for panic disorder that were scored on a generic competence measure, the Cognitive Therapy Scale - Revised (CTS-R), and the CTCP by markers with experience in CBT practice and evaluation. Trainees also provided pre- to post-treatment clinical outcomes on disorder-specific patient report measures for cases corresponding to their therapy recordings.

RESULTS

The CTCP exhibited strong internal consistency (α = .79-.91) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = .70-.88). The measure demonstrated convergent validity with the CTS-R (r = .40-.54), although investigation into competence classification indicated that the CTCP may be more sensitive at detecting competence for panic disorder-specific CBT skills. Notably, the CTCP demonstrated the first indication of a relationship between therapist competence and clinical outcome for panic disorder (r = .29-.35); no relationship was found for the CTS-R.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide initial support for the reliability and validity of the CTCP for assessing therapist competence in CBT for panic disorder and support the use of anxiety disorder-specific competence measures. Further investigation into the psychometric properties of the measure in other therapist cohorts and its relationship with clinical outcomes is recommended.

摘要

背景

恐慌症的循证治疗包括特定于疾病的认知行为疗法(CBT)方案。然而,大多数 CBT 能力的衡量标准都是通用的,因此非常需要特定于疾病的评估措施。

目的

为了填补这一空白,我们评估了针对恐慌症的认知疗法能力量表(CTCP)的心理测量特性。

方法

CBT 学员(n=60)提交了针对恐慌症的 CBT 录音,这些录音由具有 CBT 实践和评估经验的标记物根据通用能力量表,即认知疗法量表修订版(CTS-R)和 CTCP 进行评分。学员还提供了与治疗录音相对应的案例的针对特定疾病的患者报告测量的治疗前至治疗后的临床结果。

结果

CTCP 表现出很强的内部一致性(α=.79-.91)和评分者间可靠性(ICC=.70-.88)。该量表与 CTS-R 表现出了良好的聚合效度(r=.40-.54),尽管对能力分类的调查表明,CTCP 可能更能敏感地检测针对恐慌症的特定 CBT 技能的能力。值得注意的是,CTCP 首次显示出治疗师能力与恐慌症临床结果之间的关系(r=.29-.35);而 CTS-R 则没有发现这种关系。

结论

这些发现初步支持 CTCP 用于评估针对恐慌症的 CBT 治疗师能力的可靠性和有效性,并支持使用特定于焦虑症的能力衡量标准。建议进一步调查该测量方法在其他治疗师群体中的心理测量特性及其与临床结果的关系。

相似文献

1
Assessing panic disorder-specific competencies: evaluation of the Cognitive Therapy Competence Scale for panic disorder.评估惊恐障碍特异性能力:惊恐障碍认知治疗技能评定量表的评估。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2021 Mar;49(2):197-205. doi: 10.1017/S1352465820000612. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
Utilization of learned skills in cognitive behavioural therapy for panic disorder.在惊恐障碍的认知行为治疗中运用习得的技能。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Nov;47(6):645-658. doi: 10.1017/S135246581900033X. Epub 2019 May 24.
3
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.
4
Multi-professional IAPT CBT training: clinical competence and patient outcomes.多专业 IAPT CBT 培训:临床能力与患者结局。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Nov;47(6):672-685. doi: 10.1017/S1352465819000201. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
The Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Scale for Children and Young People (CBTS-CYP): development and psychometric properties.儿童和青少年认知行为治疗量表(CBTS-CYP):编制与心理测量特性
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 May;42(3):269-82. doi: 10.1017/S135246581300115X. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
6
Working alliance and competence as predictors of outcome in cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety and panic disorder in adults.工作联盟和能力作为成人社交焦虑和恐慌障碍认知行为治疗结果的预测因素。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Feb;77:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Assessing clinician competence in the delivery of cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders: development of the Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy Scale for Eating Disorders (CBTS-ED).评估临床医生在提供饮食失调认知行为疗法方面的能力:饮食失调认知行为疗法量表(CBTS-ED)的开发。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2024 Jan;53(1):29-47. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2023.2263640. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
8
Competence and Adherence Scale for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CAS-CBT) for anxiety disorders in youth: Psychometric properties.青少年焦虑症认知行为疗法能力与依从性量表(CAS-CBT):心理测量特性
Psychol Assess. 2016 Aug;28(8):908-16. doi: 10.1037/pas0000230. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
Introduction and evaluation of a therapeutic adherence and competence scale for grief-focused cognitive behavioural therapy.介绍和评价以悲伤为焦点的认知行为疗法的治疗依从性和能力量表。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Jun 15;13(1):2079873. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2079873. eCollection 2022.
10
Sensitization of catastrophic cognition in cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic disorder.惊恐障碍认知行为疗法中灾难性认知的致敏作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Dec 10;7:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy in routine psychiatric care: therapist adherence and competence, and patient outcomes for depression and anxiety disorders.常规精神科护理中认知行为疗法的质量:治疗师的依从性与能力以及抑郁症和焦虑症患者的治疗效果
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06328-4.
2
A new short version of the Cognitive Therapy Scale Revised (CTSR-4): preliminary psychometric evaluation.认知治疗量表修订版(CTSR-4)的一个新简短版本:初步心理计量评估。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00730-x.