Yılmaz Yetkin Zeki, Uğurlar Müge, Yılmaz Begüm Bahar, Gülmez Züleyha Dilek, Özdoğan Hasan Ahmet, Ataş Ahmet, Batıoğlu-Karaaltın Ayşegül
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Audiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Voice. 2023 Mar;37(2):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.030. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
The aim of the study was comparing the diagnostic role of the white light (WL) endoscopy, video laryngostroboscopy (VLS), and narrow-band imaging (NBI) in the evaluation of the benign vocal fold lesions.
From March 2018 to June 2019, a total of 118 cases were enrolled in this study. Ninety-eight patients were suspected with vocal fold nodules, cysts, polyps, and sulcus vocalis and 20 patients without a history of dysphonia. Each patient was examined by WL, VLS, and NBI endoscopy. Recorded images and videos were analyzed and scored by three otorhinolaryngologists who had at least 3 years of experience in phoniatrics field. The evaluation results were compared between the methods and the physicians.
A total of 118 cases were grouped by their confirmed diagnosis, vocal fold nodules (n = 28), vocal fold cyst (n = 24), vocal fold polyp (n = 9), and sulcus vocalis (n = 37). When the correct diagnosis rates of the physicians were compared, the statistical significance was found between the physicians in the WL and VLS method (P= 0.014, P= 0.027). No statistically significant difference was found among physicians in NBI method (P = 0.368). The difference between the diagnostic methods was found to be statistically significant in reaching the accurate diagnosis for benign vocal fold lesions (P< 0.001). While the difference between NBI-WL and VLS-WL was statistically significant (P< 0.001 and P< 0.001). The difference between NBI-VLS was not statistically significant while evaluating the vocal fold nodules, cysts, and sulcus vocalis separately (P= 0.102, P = 0.026, P = 0.157). Otherwise, it was statistically significant (P= 0.002) while evaluating total benign lesions in the study. The difference between NBI-VLS combination and VLS, NBI-VLS combination and VLS-WL combination were statistically significant (P< 0.001 and P= 0.001).
This study showed that NBI assessments have similar accuracy and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) to VLS and have a higher value than WL endoscopy in reaching the diagnosis for benign vocal fold lesions. Therefore, NBI can be accepted as a promising approach to identify benign laryngeal lesions due to its optical properties.
本研究旨在比较白光(WL)内镜检查、视频喉动态镜检查(VLS)和窄带成像(NBI)在评估良性声带病变中的诊断作用。
2018年3月至2019年6月,本研究共纳入118例患者。98例患者疑似有声带小结、囊肿、息肉和声带沟,20例患者无声音嘶哑病史。每位患者均接受WL、VLS和NBI内镜检查。由三位在嗓音医学领域至少有3年经验的耳鼻喉科医生对记录的图像和视频进行分析和评分。比较不同方法和医生之间的评估结果。
118例患者根据确诊诊断分组,声带小结(n = 28)、声带囊肿(n = 24)、声带息肉(n = 9)和声带沟(n = 37)。比较医生的正确诊断率时,WL和VLS方法的医生之间存在统计学意义(P = 0.014,P = 0.027)。NBI方法的医生之间未发现统计学显著差异(P = 0.368)。发现诊断方法在准确诊断良性声带病变方面存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.001)。而NBI-WL与VLS-WL之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001和P < 0.001)。分别评估声带小结、囊肿和声带沟时,NBI-VLS之间的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.102,P = 0.026,P = 0.157)。否则,在评估本研究中的总良性病变时具有统计学意义(P = 0.002)。NBI-VLS联合与VLS、NBI-VLS联合与VLS-WL联合之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001和P = 0.001)。
本研究表明,NBI评估在诊断良性声带病变方面与VLS具有相似的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),且比WL内镜检查具有更高的价值。因此,由于其光学特性,NBI可被视为一种有前景的识别良性喉部病变的方法。