Yoshida Yosuke, Kaneko Masayuki, Narukawa Mamoru
Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Shirokane 5-9-1, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641, Japan.
MSD K.K., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Pharmaceut Med. 2021 Mar;35(2):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s40290-021-00383-y. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
Progression-free survival (PFS) has not been validated as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
This study aimed to investigate an impact of advantage in tumor response on the correlation between PFS and OS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Based on a literature search, we identified randomized controlled trials of first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The impact of absolute difference in objective response rate between treatment arms on the correlation between hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS was evaluated based on Spearman rank correlation coefficients.
Sixty trials with a total of 29,134 patients were identified. The HR for PFS showed a relatively higher correlation with HR for OS (r = 0.75) when the trials were limited to those that demonstrated a larger advantage in objective response rate, compared with the case for trials that demonstrated a smaller advantage (r = 0.66). This tendency was also observed in the subgroup analysis stratified by the types of treatment agents (non-targeted, anti-angiogenic, and immunotherapy) except for the group of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted agents.
The magnitude of advantage in tumor response was suggested to contribute to a better prediction of OS-HR based on PFS-HR in clinical trials in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
无进展生存期(PFS)尚未被确认为晚期非小细胞肺癌患者总生存期(OS)的替代终点。
本研究旨在探讨肿瘤反应优势对晚期非小细胞肺癌PFS与OS相关性的影响。
基于文献检索,我们确定了晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的随机对照试验。根据Spearman等级相关系数,评估治疗组间客观缓解率的绝对差异对PFS与OS风险比(HR)相关性的影响。
共纳入60项试验,总计29134例患者。与客观缓解率优势较小的试验(r = 0.66)相比,当试验仅限于那些在客观缓解率方面显示出较大优势的试验时,PFS的HR与OS的HR显示出相对较高的相关性(r = 0.75)。在按治疗药物类型(非靶向、抗血管生成和免疫治疗)分层的亚组分析中也观察到这种趋势,但表皮生长因子受体靶向药物组除外。
在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床试验中,肿瘤反应优势的大小被认为有助于基于PFS-HR更好地预测OS-HR。