Suppr超能文献

膝关节置换术中应用内侧副韧带近端“馅饼皮样”切开纠正内翻畸形。

Pie-crusting of proximal medial collateral ligament for correcting varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, Punjab, 151001, India.

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, India.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Oct;31(7):1305-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02849-2. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Aim of this study was to compare outcomes of a newer technique of pie-crusting of the femoral origin of medial collateral ligament (MCL) with the conventional medial release, for correcting varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty. Null hypothesis was that there is no difference in clinical outcomes between these two techniques.

METHODS

All patients requiring an additional medial release after excision of osteophytes and release of deep MCL during total knee arthroplasty were allocated into two groups, alternately. Each group composed of 40 patients. Pie-crusting with a needle was done near the femoral attachment of superficial MCL in group-1, whereas the group-2 underwent classic sub-periosteal release of the tibial insertion of superficial MCL. All the patients were assessed for any laxity (more than 3 mm opening) intraoperatively or at one-year follow-up, pain score at 12 and 24 h after the surgery, Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and range of motion 12 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

None of the patients showed any signs of laxity or failure at one-year follow-up. Pain scores were slightly better (not statistically significant) in the group-1. However, no differences were noted in functional outcomes scores.

CONCLUSION

Pie-crusting of superficial MCL is a safe, controlled and less invasive approach for medial soft tissue release. When knee deformity is not correctable with initial soft tissue release, this is an appropriate next surgical step. There does not appear to be a risk of over-release during the surgery or afterward.

STUDY DESIGN

Non-randomized controlled trial, Level II.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较内侧副韧带(MCL)股骨起点饼皮切开术与传统内侧松解术治疗全膝关节置换术时矫正内翻畸形的效果。零假设为这两种技术的临床结果没有差异。

方法

所有在全膝关节置换术中切除骨赘和深层 MCL 松解后需要额外进行内侧松解的患者,被交替分配到两组。每组 40 例。组 1 在浅层 MCL 浅附着处用针进行饼皮切开,而组 2 则进行经典的胫骨浅层 MCL 插入部骨膜下松解。所有患者均在术中或 1 年随访时评估有无松弛(超过 3 毫米的张开),术后 12 小时和 24 小时的疼痛评分,膝关节学会评分,西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数,以及术后 12 个月的关节活动度。

结果

在 1 年随访时,没有患者出现任何松弛或失败的迹象。组 1 的疼痛评分稍好(无统计学意义)。然而,功能结果评分没有差异。

结论

浅层 MCL 的饼皮切开术是一种安全、可控和微创的内侧软组织松解方法。当膝关节畸形不能通过初始软组织松解纠正时,这是一个合适的下一步手术。在手术过程中和之后似乎没有过度松解的风险。

研究设计

非随机对照试验,II 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验