• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单极桡骨头置换的长期疗效和生存率。

Long-term outcome and survival rate of monopolar radial head replacement.

机构信息

Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany; German Joint Centre, ATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):e361-e369. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.031. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.031
PMID:33484832
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purposes of this study were (1) to report functional outcomes; (2) to assess complications, revisions, and survival rate; and (3) to assess differences in functional outcomes between removed and retained radial head arthroplasties (RHAs), early and delayed treatment, and type of RHA used at long-term follow-up after monopolar RHA for unreconstructible radial head fractures or their sequelae.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients (mean age, 59.2 years) who were at least 6 years postoperatively after monopolar RHA for unreconstructible RHFs or their sequelae were included. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS); Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score; visual analog scale; postoperative satisfaction (1-6, 6 = highly unsatisfied); range of motion; complications; and revisions were assessed. Radiographic findings were reported. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Subgroups (RHA type, early vs. delayed surgery, RHA removed vs. retained) were compared.

RESULTS

At a median clinical follow-up of 9.5 years (range: 6.0-28.4 years), median MEPS was 80.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60.0-97.5), median QuickDASH was 22.0 (IQR: 4.6-42.6), median visual analog scale was 1 (IQR: 0-4), median postoperative satisfaction was 2 (IQR: 1-3), and median arc of extension/flexion was 110° (IQR: 80°-130°). Radiographic follow-up was available for 48 patients at a median of 7.0 years (range: 2.0-15.0 years). Heterotopic ossifications were seen in 14 (29.2%), moderate-to-severe capitellar osteopenia/abrasion in 3 (6.1%), moderate-to-severe ulnohumeral degeneration in 3 (6.1%), and periprosthetic radiolucencies in 17 (35.4%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (37.2%) had complications and 20 patients (25.6%) underwent RHA exchange or removal. Kaplan-Meier analysis with failure defined as RHA exchange or removal demonstrated survival of 75.1% (95% confidence interval: 63.7-83.3) at 18 years. The highest annual failure rate was observed in the first year in which the RHAs of 7 patients (9%) were exchanged or removed. No significant differences were detected between type of RHA in MEPS (Mathys: 82.5 [75.0-100] vs. Evolve: 80.0 [60.0-95.0]; P = .341) and QuickDASH (Mathys: 12.5 [0-34.4] vs. Evolve: 26.7 [6.9-46.2]; P = .112). Early surgery (≤3 weeks) yielded significantly superior MEPS (80.0 [70.0-100.0] vs. 52.5 [30.0-83.8]; P = .014) and QuickDASH (18.6 [1.5-32.6] vs. 46.2 [31.5-75.6]; P = .002) compared with delayed surgery (>3 weeks). Patients with retained RHAs had significantly better MEPS (80.0 [67.5-100] vs. 70.0 [32.5-82.5]; P = .016) and QuickDASH (18.1 [1.7-31.9] vs. 49.1 [22.1-73.8]; P = .007) compared with patients with removed RHAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes for RHA are satisfactory; however, there is a high complication and revision rate, resulting in implant survival of 75.1% at 18 years with the highest annual failure rate observed in the first postoperative year.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是:(1)报告功能结果;(2)评估并发症、翻修和生存率;(3)在单极桡骨头置换(RHA)后至少 6 年的长期随访中,评估保留和去除桡骨头假体、早期和延迟手术以及使用的 RHA 类型之间的功能结果差异。

方法

78 例(平均年龄 59.2 岁)患者至少在单极 RHA 治疗不可重建的桡骨头骨折或其后遗症后 6 年以上进行了手术。采用 Mayo 肘功能评分(MEPS)、快速残疾的胳膊、肩膀和手(QuickDASH)评分、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后满意度(1-6,6 表示非常不满意)、活动范围、并发症和翻修来评估。报告影像学结果。进行 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析。比较了 RHA 类型、早期与延迟手术、保留与去除 RHA 等亚组。

结果

在中位数为 9.5 年(范围:6.0-28.4 年)的临床随访中,中位数 MEPS 为 80.0(四分位距[IQR]:60.0-97.5),中位数 QuickDASH 为 22.0(IQR:4.6-42.6),中位数 VAS 为 1(IQR:0-4),中位数术后满意度为 2(IQR:1-3),中位数的屈伸弧为 110°(IQR:80°-130°)。48 例患者在中位数为 7.0 年(范围:2.0-15.0 年)时进行了影像学随访。14 例(29.2%)有异位骨化,3 例(6.1%)有中度至重度尺骨滑车骨骨质疏松/磨损,3 例(6.1%)有中度至重度肱尺关节退变,17 例(35.4%)有假体周围透亮区。29 例(37.2%)有并发症,20 例(25.6%)进行了 RHA 置换或去除。以 RHA 置换或去除为失败定义的 Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,18 年后 RHA 的生存率为 75.1%(95%置信区间:63.7%-83.3%)。在第一年,7 例患者(9%)的 RHA 被更换或去除,其年失败率最高。在 MEPS(Mathys:82.5[75.0-100] vs. Evolve:80.0[60.0-95.0];P=.341)和 QuickDASH(Mathys:12.5[0-34.4] vs. Evolve:26.7[6.9-46.2];P=.112)方面,两种 RHA 类型之间没有显著差异。早期手术(≤3 周)的 MEPS(80.0[70.0-100.0] vs. 52.5[30.0-83.8];P=.014)和 QuickDASH(18.6[1.5-32.6] vs. 46.2[31.5-75.6];P=.002)显著优于延迟手术(>3 周)。保留 RHA 的患者的 MEPS(80.0[67.5-100] vs. 70.0[32.5-82.5];P=.016)和 QuickDASH(18.1[1.7-31.9] vs. 49.1[22.1-73.8];P=.007)显著优于去除 RHA 的患者。

结论

RHA 的长期结果令人满意,但并发症和翻修率较高,导致 18 年时的植入物生存率为 75.1%,第一年的年失败率最高。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome and survival rate of monopolar radial head replacement.单极桡骨头置换的长期疗效和生存率。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):e361-e369. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.031. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Outcomes and radiographic findings of anatomic press-fit radial head arthroplasty.解剖型压配式桡骨头置换术的疗效及影像学表现
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):802-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
High Risk of Further Surgery After Radial Head Replacement for Unstable Fractures: Longer-term Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 8 Years.桡骨头置换术后不稳定骨折再次手术风险高:至少 8 年的长期随访结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2531-2540. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000876.
4
Risk Factors for Revision Surgery Following Radial Head Arthroplasty without Cement for Unreconstructible Radial Head Fractures: Minimum 3-Year Follow-up.桡骨头置换术治疗不可重建桡骨头骨折后翻修手术的危险因素:至少 3 年随访。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Apr 21;103(8):688-695. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01231.
5
Mid-term outcomes of 77 modular radial head prostheses.77个模块化桡骨头假体的中期结果
Bone Joint J. 2017 Sep;99-B(9):1197-1203. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1043.R2.
6
Acute versus delayed radial head arthroplasty for the treatment of radial head fractures.桡骨头骨折的急性与延迟桡骨头置换治疗。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Dec;31(12):2506-2513. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.031. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
Pyrocarbon radial head arthroplasty offers satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with low revision rate: A systematic review.热解碳头径向假体置换术具有较低的翻修率,可获得满意的临床和影像学结果:一项系统评价。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 May;110(3):103750. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103750. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
8
The outcomes of surgical treatment of complex radial head fractures.复杂桡骨头骨折的手术治疗结果。
Bone Joint J. 2024 Oct 1;106-B(10):1158-1164. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0407.R1.
9
Radial Head Fractures Treated with Modular Metallic Radial Head Replacement: Outcomes at a Mean Follow-up of Eight Years.采用模块化金属桡骨头置换治疗桡骨头骨折:平均八年随访结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Apr 6;98(7):527-35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00128.
10
Post-traumatic elbow osteoarthritis after radial head arthroplasty: Prevalence and risk factors.桡骨头置换术后创伤后肘关节炎:患病率及危险因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Apr;107(2):102814. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102814. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on elbow arthroplasties with emphasis on imaging.肘关节置换术的最新进展,重点在于影像学
Pol J Radiol. 2024 May 20;89:e249-e266. doi: 10.5114/pjr/186592. eCollection 2024.
2
The comparative performance of radial head prostheses in patients younger than and older than 50 years: a systematic review.50岁及以下与50岁以上患者桡骨头假体的比较性能:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022 Oct 19;3(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.09.008. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Variation in radial head fracture treatment recommendations in terrible triad injuries is not influenced by viewing two-dimensional computed tomography.
对于复杂肘关节损伤中桡骨头骨折治疗建议的差异,二维计算机断层扫描观察并未产生影响。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Jun;26(2):156-161. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01368. Epub 2023 May 17.
4
Radial head replacement - A comprehensive review.桡骨头置换术——一篇综述
J Orthop. 2022 Dec 15;36:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.12.003. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Autologous replacement of the head of the radius-proximal fibula versus second metatarsal base: an anatomic feasibility study.自体桡骨近端腓骨头置换与第二跖骨基底置换:解剖学可行性研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 May;143(5):2437-2446. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04460-y. Epub 2022 May 9.