Sevenhuysen Samantha L, Kent Fiona, Wright Caroline, Williams Cylie, Bowles Kelly-Ann, Matthews Kristie, Ayton Darshini, Maloney Stephen
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Faculty Medicine, Nursing Health Sciences at Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104768. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Students on clinical placement may encounter practice that deviates from what they perceive to be evidence-based. However, queries by students about the evidence-base of their clinical educators decision-making and practice can be a challenging conversation to initiate. It is unclear how these conversations occur, and what impact engaging in these challenging conversations may have on practice, the learning experience, and the relationship with the educator. This study sought to explore clinical educators' experiences of student-initiated discussions that question the evidence-base of their clinical practice. And to identify their preferred approaches for students to initiate these conversations. Individual interviews were conducted with 23 clinical educators from five professions at three different hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Semi-structured interviewing techniques were employed to identify participants' context and experiences. Participants described student-initiated conversations about deviations from evidence-based practice as challenging encounters with potential for positive or negative impact on clinical educators, students and patients. They noted that the perceived appropriateness of the discussion could be influenced by the method utilised by students to initiate the conversation. Elements identified by clinical educators as barriers or enablers to support students to appropriately initiate conversations about clinical practice may be utilised by education and health providers to enhance opportunities for learning conversations to occur.
参加临床实习的学生可能会遇到与他们所认为的循证实践相悖的做法。然而,让学生询问临床带教老师决策和实践的循证依据,可能是一场颇具挑战性的对话。目前尚不清楚这些对话是如何发生的,以及参与这些具有挑战性的对话可能会对实践、学习体验以及与带教老师的关系产生何种影响。本研究旨在探讨临床带教老师对于学生发起的、质疑其临床实践循证依据的讨论的经历。并确定他们对于学生发起这些对话的首选方式。研究人员对来自澳大利亚维多利亚州三家不同医院五个专业的23名临床带教老师进行了个人访谈。采用半结构化访谈技术来了解参与者的背景和经历。参与者将学生发起的关于偏离循证实践的对话描述为具有挑战性的遭遇,可能会对临床带教老师、学生和患者产生积极或消极影响。他们指出,讨论的可接受程度可能会受到学生发起对话所采用方法的影响。临床带教老师确定的、支持学生恰当地发起关于临床实践对话的障碍或促进因素,教育机构和医疗服务提供者可加以利用,以增加进行学习对话的机会。