Recognition and treatment of status epilepticus in the prehospital setting.

PURPOSE

We performed this retrospective data bank analysis to evaluate the management of status epilepticus (SE) in the prehospital setting and the possible association of treatment delay or insufficient treatment approach with outcome.

METHOD

We evaluated all treatment episodes of a prehospital SE according to our hospital record system between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2018. Classification according to the ILAE classification of 2015, Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) at admission and the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge or in hospital death were recorded or calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Withney-U test, the Chi-Square test and corrections of Yates and Bonferroni-Holmes where appropriate.

RESULTS

There were 331 treatment episodes in 282 patients with a fatality rate of 7.6 %. Median age at treatment was 72 years. Patients who died were significantly older and had a higher STESS and CCI than patients who survived. SE was recognised in the prehospital setting in only 56.8 % of treatment episodes. Patients in treatment episodes with recognized SE were significantly younger than the others. Status epilepticus was more often recognized, when epilepsy was known. Overall in 48 % of treatment episodes with another SE type than generalized convulsive SE the diagnosis was missed. CCI was significantly higher in the episodes without recognized SE. Patients were more often discharged from hospital with a new deficit, when the SE was not recognized in the prehospital setting. In treatment episodes with initiation of a benzodiazepine (BZD) the patients were more likely to be discharged without a new deficit than others. After excluding cases with insufficient documentation of treatment steps 273 treatment episodes remained. In 178 of these treatment episodes epilepsy was known before, but in only 11.2 % of them a rescue medication was given by bystanders. In only 6.7 % of treatment episodes of SE in patients with known epilepsy a BZD was given in an appropriate way by bystanders. In nearly all treatment episodes with lorazepam (88.9 %) or midazolam (97.8 %) the dosage was below the recommended level.

CONCLUSIONS

Missing the SE in the prehospital setting was frequent and associated with a higher risk of developing a new neurological deficit. Treatment with BZD was associated with a lower risk of developing a new neurological deficit, but was underdosed in the vast majority of situations.