Johnson Kyle, Lane Brian R, Weizer Alon Z, Herrel Lindsey A, Rogers Craig G, Qi Ji, Johnson Anna M, Seifman Brian D, Sarle Richard C
Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI; Spectrum Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI.
Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;39(4):239.e9-239.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
To examine length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates for all minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) and MI radical nephrectomy (MIRN) performed for localized renal masses ≤7 cm in size (cT1RM) within 12 Michigan urology practices. Both RN and PN are commonly performed in treating cT1RM. Although technically more complex and associated with higher complication rates, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services considers MIPN an outpatient procedure and MIRN is inpatient.
We collected data for renal surgeries for cT1RM at MUSIC-KIDNEY practices between May 2017-February 2020. Data abstractors recorded clinical, radiographic, pathologic, surgical, and short-term follow-up data into the registry for cT1RM patients.
Within MUSIC-KIDNEY, 807 patients underwent MI renal surgery at 12 practices. Median LOS for cT1RM patients after MIPN (n = 531, 66%) was 2 days and after MIRN (n = 276, 34%) was also 2 days. Among patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic PN, 171 (32%), 230 (43%), and 130 (24%) stayed ≤1, 2, ≥3 days. Among patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic RN, 81 (29%), 112 (41%), and 83 (30%) stayed ≤1, 2, ≥3 days. No significant difference was observed between MIPN and MIRN on LOS commensurate with outpatient surgery (≤1-day, OR = 0.97, P = 0.87).
Less than one-third of patients had a LOS ≤1-day and LOS was comparable for MIPN and MIRN. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should be advised that MIPN is a more complex surgery than MIRN, most patients receiving a MIPN will require a ≥2-day hospital stay and it would be more appropriate to classify MIPN an inpatient procedure with MIRN.
在密歇根州的12家泌尿外科诊所中,研究对大小≤7 cm的局限性肾肿块(cT1RM)进行的所有微创部分肾切除术(MIPN)和微创根治性肾切除术(MIRN)的住院时间(LOS)和再入院率。肾根治性切除术(RN)和部分肾切除术(PN)在治疗cT1RM中均常用。尽管MIPN在技术上更为复杂且并发症发生率更高,但医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心将MIPN视为门诊手术,而MIRN则为住院手术。
我们收集了2017年5月至2020年2月期间在MUSIC-KIDNEY诊所进行的cT1RM肾手术数据。数据提取人员将临床、影像学、病理、手术和短期随访数据记录到cT1RM患者的登记册中。
在MUSIC-KIDNEY范围内,12家诊所的807例患者接受了微创肾脏手术。MIPN术后(n = 531,66%)cT1RM患者的中位住院时间为2天,MIRN术后(n = 276,34%)也是2天。在接受腹腔镜或机器人PN的患者中,171例(32%)、230例(43%)和130例(24%)住院≤1天、2天、≥3天。在接受腹腔镜或机器人RN的患者中,81例(29%)、112例(41%)和83例(30%)住院≤1天、2天、≥3天。在与门诊手术相当的住院时间(≤1天)方面,MIPN和MIRN之间未观察到显著差异(OR = 0.97,P = 0.87)。
不到三分之一的患者住院时间≤1天,MIPN和MIRN的住院时间相当。应告知医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心,MIPN是比MIRN更复杂的手术,大多数接受MIPN的患者需要住院≥2天,将MIPN与MIRN归为住院手术更为合适。