Ictal injury: Epilepsy vs. functional (psychogenic) seizures.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the current study was to compare the risk and also the types of ictal injuries in three groups of people with seizures [i.e., IGE vs. TLE vs. FS].

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. All patients with an electro-clinical diagnosis of IGE, TLE, or FS were recruited at the outpatient epilepsy clinic at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, from 2008 until 2020. Age, sex, age at seizure onset, seizure type(s), and occurrence of ictal injury at any time since the onset of the seizures and its characteristics were registered routinely for all patients at the time of the first visit.

RESULTS

One thousand and one hundred seventy-four patients were studied (481 patients with IGE, 402 people with TLE, and 291 persons with FS). While the groups differed in their demographic and clinical characteristics, the rates of ictal injury did not differ significantly between the groups. Tongue injury was more frequently reported by patients with TLE compared with that by people with IGE or FS. Other types/locations of ictal injury were more or less reported by all three groups of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Ictal injuries may happen with more or less similar rates among people with epilepsy (IGE and TLE) and those with FS. Ictal injury (rate, type, or location) should not be used as a marker for any specific diagnosis among people with seizures.