University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Thromb Res. 2021 Mar;199:119-122. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
Anticoagulated patients are often seen unnecessarily in the emergency department (ED) for epistaxis, leading to increased healthcare costs. Patients are often unaware of preventative and management techniques for handling epistaxis in the home.
In 2016, the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI), a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan-sponsored consortium of 6 anticoagulation clinics in Michigan, implemented an epistaxis-management educational program for warfarin-treated patients with the goal of reducing unnecessary ED visits. A pre-implementation cohort (2014-2015) consisted of patients who did not receive epistaxis-related educational materials. A post-implementation cohort (2017-2018) received epistaxis educational materials covering home treatment and prevention strategies. Patient characteristics and outcomes (rates of epistaxis and epistaxis ED visits) were compared using Chi-square, Poisson regression, and t-tests.
Of the 4473 patients included, 2634 (58.9%) initiated warfarin in the pre-implementation phase and 1839 (41.1%) initiated warfarin in the post-implementation phase. The post-implementation cohort had a lower overall epistaxis rate (13.4 vs 10.4 per 100 patient-year, pre- vs. post-implementation; p = 0.029), a lower epistaxis-related ED visit rate (5.6 vs. 3.1 per 100 patient-year; p = 0.003), and a lower proportion of nosebleeds that led to an ED visit (42% vs. 30%; p = 0.032). After controlling for antiplatelet use, renal disease, and time in therapeutic range, both cohorts were equally likely to have nosebleeds (RR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.58-1.02); however, the post-implementation cohort was less likely to visit the ED for epistaxis (RR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32-0.84).
An epistaxis education program was associated with a reduction in epistaxis-related ED visits among warfarin-treated patients.
抗凝患者常因鼻出血而不必要地到急诊科就诊,导致医疗保健费用增加。患者通常不知道在家中处理鼻出血的预防和管理技术。
2016 年,密歇根州抗凝质量改进倡议(MAQI),一个由密歇根州的 6 个抗凝诊所组成的蓝十字蓝盾密歇根州赞助的联盟,为接受华法林治疗的患者实施了一项鼻出血管理教育计划,目的是减少不必要的急诊科就诊。在实施前的队列(2014-2015 年)中,患者未接受与鼻出血相关的教育材料。实施后的队列(2017-2018 年)接受了涵盖家庭治疗和预防策略的鼻出血教育材料。使用卡方检验、泊松回归和 t 检验比较患者特征和结局(鼻出血发生率和鼻出血急诊科就诊率)。
在纳入的 4473 名患者中,2634 名(58.9%)在实施前阶段开始服用华法林,1839 名(41.1%)在实施后阶段开始服用华法林。实施后的队列总体鼻出血发生率较低(13.4 比 10.4/100 患者年,前 vs. 后实施;p=0.029),鼻出血相关急诊科就诊率较低(5.6 比 3.1/100 患者年;p=0.003),导致急诊科就诊的鼻出血比例较低(42%比 30%;p=0.032)。控制抗血小板药物、肾脏疾病和治疗范围内的时间后,两个队列发生鼻出血的可能性相当(RR 0.77,95%CI:0.58-1.02);然而,实施后的队列因鼻出血而就诊的可能性较小(RR 0.52,95%CI:0.32-0.84)。
一项鼻出血教育计划与接受华法林治疗的患者因鼻出血相关的急诊科就诊率降低相关。