Fully automatic detection and classification of phytoplankton specimens in digital microscopy images.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The proliferation of toxin-producing phytoplankton species can compromise the quality of the water sources. This contamination is difficult to detect, and consequently to be neutralised, since normal water purification techniques are ineffective. Currently, the water analyses about phytoplankton are commonly performed by the specialists with manual routine analyses, which represents a major limitation. The adequate identification and classification of phytoplankton specimens requires intensive training and expertise. Additionally, the performed analysis involves a lengthy process that exhibits serious problems of reliability and repeatability as inter-expert agreement is not always reached. Considering all those factors, the automatization of these analyses is, therefore, highly desirable to reduce the workload of the specialists and facilitate the process.

METHODS

This manuscript proposes a novel fully automatic methodology to perform phytoplankton analyses in digital microscopy images of water samples taken with a regular light microscope. In particular, we propose a method capable of analysing multi-specimen images acquired using a simplified systematic protocol. In contrast with prior approaches, this enables its use without the necessity of an expert taxonomist operating the microscope. The system is able to detect and segment the different existing phytoplankton specimens, with high variability in terms of visual appearances, and to merge them into colonies and sparse specimens when necessary. Moreover, the system is capable of differentiating them from other similar objects like zooplankton, detritus or mineral particles, among others, and then classify the specimens into defined target species of interest using a machine learning-based approach.

RESULTS

The proposed system provided satisfactory and accurate results in every step. The detection step provided a FNR of 0.4%. Phytoplankton detection, that is, differentiating true phytoplankton from similar objects (zooplankton, minerals, etc.), provided a result of 84.07% of precision at 90% of recall. The target species classification, reported an overall accuracy of 87.50%. The recall levels for each species are, 81.82% for W. naegeliana, 57.15% for A. spiroides, 85.71% for D. sociale and 95% for the "Other" group, a set of relevant toxic and interesting species widely spread over the samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed methodology provided accurate results in all the designed steps given the complexity of the problem, particularly in terms of specimen identification, phytoplankton differentiation as well as the classification of the defined target species. Therefore, this fully automatic system represents a robust and consistent tool to aid the specialists in the analysis of the quality of the water sources and potability.