• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统炎症反应指数预测临床 T1-2N0 期口腔鳞状细胞癌患者的生存。

The systemic inflammation response index predicts the survival of patients with clinical T1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Oral Dis. 2022 Apr;28(3):600-610. doi: 10.1111/odi.13782. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1111/odi.13782
PMID:33486833
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) is an independent prognostic factor for many malignant tumors. However, the value of this factor in patients with clinical T1-2N0 (cT1-2N0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is still unclear.

METHODS

We calculated SIRI of 235 cT1-2N0 OSCC patients from 2013 to 2017. Multivariate cox regression analysis was applied to verify the prognostic significance of SIRI. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to analyze the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) for cT1-2N0 OSCC patients.

RESULTS

According to the optimal cutoff point of SIRI, we divided cT1-2N0 OSCC patients into high SIRI group (SIRI ≥ 1.3) and low SIRI group (SIRI < 1.3). SIRI was an independent prognostic indicator for OS (HR = 2.87; 95% CI = 1.35-6.10; p = .006) and DSS (HR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.10-4.27; p = .025). High SIRI had a significantly poorer OS (p = .001) and DSS (p = .007) in survival analysis than the low SIRI. Moreover, the prognostic value of SIRI was significantly stronger than neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative SIRI can be regarded as a meaningful indicator for poor survival of cT1-2N0 OSCC patients, and it is a promising tool to formulate the best individualized treatment for high-risk patients.

摘要

目的

全身性炎症反应指数(SIRI)是许多恶性肿瘤的独立预后因素。然而,该因素在临床 T1-2N0(cT1-2N0)口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者中的价值尚不清楚。

方法

我们对 2013 年至 2017 年间的 235 例 cT1-2N0 OSCC 患者计算了 SIRI。采用多变量 cox 回归分析验证 SIRI 的预后意义。绘制 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析 cT1-2N0 OSCC 患者的总生存(OS)和疾病特异性生存(DSS)。

结果

根据 SIRI 的最佳截断点,我们将 cT1-2N0 OSCC 患者分为高 SIRI 组(SIRI≥1.3)和低 SIRI 组(SIRI<1.3)。SIRI 是 OS(HR=2.87;95%CI=1.35-6.10;p=0.006)和 DSS(HR=2.17;95%CI=1.10-4.27;p=0.025)的独立预后指标。在生存分析中,高 SIRI 患者的 OS(p=0.001)和 DSS(p=0.007)明显较差。此外,SIRI 的预后价值明显强于中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)。

结论

术前 SIRI 可作为 cT1-2N0 OSCC 患者生存不良的有意义指标,是为高危患者制定最佳个体化治疗方案的有前途工具。

相似文献

1
The systemic inflammation response index predicts the survival of patients with clinical T1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma.系统炎症反应指数预测临床 T1-2N0 期口腔鳞状细胞癌患者的生存。
Oral Dis. 2022 Apr;28(3):600-610. doi: 10.1111/odi.13782. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Prognostic value of preoperative systemic inflammation response index in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: Propensity score-based analysis.术前全身炎症反应指数在口腔鳞状细胞癌患者中的预后价值:基于倾向评分的分析
Head Neck. 2020 Nov;42(11):3263-3274. doi: 10.1002/hed.26375. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
3
In Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Systemic Inflammation Response Index is a Useful Prognostic Indicator.在接受新辅助化疗的胃癌患者中,全身炎症反应指数是一种有用的预后指标。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2021 Oct 12;27:1609811. doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.1609811. eCollection 2021.
4
Prognostic Value of Inflammatory and Nutritional Markers for Patients With Early-Stage Poorly-to Moderately-Differentiated Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.早期低-中分化宫颈鳞癌患者炎症和营养标志物的预后价值。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748221148913. doi: 10.1177/10732748221148913.
5
Prognostic capacity of Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)对头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的预后评估能力
Head Neck. 2020 Feb;42(2):336-343. doi: 10.1002/hed.26010. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
6
The Prognostic Capacity of Systemic Inflammation Response Index, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio, and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.系统性炎症反应指数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值对下咽鳞癌患者预后的预测价值。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2022;84(6):453-463. doi: 10.1159/000524870. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
7
Pretreatment peripheral blood leukocytes are independent predictors of survival in oral cavity cancer.口腔癌患者治疗前外周血白细胞是独立的生存预后预测因素。
Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):994-1003. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32591. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
8
Neck observation versus elective neck dissection in management of clinical T1/2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study of 232 patients.临床T1/2N0期口腔鳞状细胞癌治疗中颈部观察与选择性颈部清扫术的比较:232例患者的回顾性研究
Chin J Cancer Res. 2017 Jun;29(3):179-188. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.03.03.
9
Systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes of patients undergoing curative resection for oral squamous cell carcinoma.系统炎症反应预测口腔鳞状细胞癌患者根治性切除术后结局的价值。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun;60(5):589-595. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
10
Prognostic implications of preoperative systemic inflammatory markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma, and correlations with the local immune tumor microenvironment.术前系统性炎症标志物对口腔鳞状细胞癌的预后意义,及其与局部免疫肿瘤微环境的相关性。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 26;13:941351. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.941351. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between HPV Circulating Tumor DNA and Prognostic Inflammatory Indices in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Study.口咽鳞状细胞癌中HPV循环肿瘤DNA与预后炎症指标之间的关联:一项初步研究
OTO Open. 2025 Apr 18;9(2):e70116. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70116. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic inflammation response index for oral cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.系统免疫炎症指数和全身炎症反应指数对口腔癌的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Nov 1;29(6):e822-e831. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26779.