Shu T, Li B, Zhao D, Wang Y T, Liu S H
Department of Gynecology Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 25;56(1):43-51. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20201112-00832.
To evaluate the security and clinical outcomes of open nerve-plane sparing radical hysterectomy (NPSRH) for operable locally advanced cervical cancer, compared with conventional radical hysterectomy (CRH). All 389 cases with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2009) stage Ⅰb2 and Ⅱa2 cervical cancer were retrospectively analyzed in Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between January 2008 and December 2014. Of all the patients, 69 cases underwent laparotomic NPSRH, and other 320 cases underwent CRH. Patients' general characteristics and intraoperative parameters were evaluated between the two groups. Basic clinical and pathological informations between the two groups were matched. After median 82 months' follow-up,disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative recovery of bladder function were compared between the two groups. (1) Compared to CRH group, NPSRH group had less intraoperative bleeding [(366±302) vs (457±301) ml; =2.305, =0.022], and a little bit longer operation time [(262±51) vs (245±52) minutes; =2.621, =0.009]. (2) Compared to CRH group, NPSRH group had shorter duration of urethral catheterization [(11±9) vs (16±7) days; =3.906, <0.01], and better postoperative bladder sensation and function in one year (6.1% vs 16.0%; χ=4.418, =0.036). (3) The 5-year DFS rate and 5-year OS rate of all patients were 89.6% and 89.9%, respectively. Either preserving pelvic autonomic nerves or not had little effect on the 5-year DFS rate (NPSRH vs CRH: 90.9% vs 89.4%; =0.714) or on 5-year OS rate (NPSRH vs CRH: 90.0% vs 89.9%; =0.910) for locally advanced cervical cancer. Univariate analysis showed that lymphatic vascular space infiltration (LVSI) and pelvic lymphatic metastasis were significantly correlated with prognosis (<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that pelvic lymphatic metastasis was the independent prognostic factor of 5-year DFS rate (=1.31, 95%: 1.01-1.68, =0.040) as well as 5-year OS rate (=1.30, 95%: 1.01-1.67, =0.046) for locally advanced cervical cancer. Open NPSRH is feasible for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, which could improve both short-term and long-term bladder function, and is not a risk factor for the prognosis of patients.
为评估可手术的局部晚期宫颈癌行开放性保留神经平面根治性子宫切除术(NPSRH)与传统根治性子宫切除术(CRH)相比的安全性及临床结局。回顾性分析2008年1月至2014年12月在中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院收治的389例国际妇产科联盟(FIGO,2009年)Ⅰb2期和Ⅱa2期宫颈癌患者。所有患者中,69例行开腹NPSRH,另外320例行CRH。评估两组患者的一般特征及术中参数。两组间基本临床和病理信息相匹配。中位随访82个月后,比较两组患者的无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)及术后膀胱功能恢复情况。(1)与CRH组相比,NPSRH组术中出血量更少[(366±302) vs (457±301)ml;t = 2.305,P = 0.022],手术时间稍长[(262±51) vs (245±52)分钟;t = 2.621,P = 0.009]。(2)与CRH组相比,NPSRH组导尿管留置时间更短[(11±9) vs (16±7)天;t = 3.906,P < 0.01],术后1年膀胱感觉及功能更好(6.1% vs 16.0%;χ² = 4.418,P = 0.036)。(3)所有患者的5年DFS率和5年OS率分别为89.6%和89.9%。对于局部晚期宫颈癌,保留或不保留盆腔自主神经对5年DFS率(NPSRH组 vs CRH组:90.9% vs 89.4%;P = 0.714)或5年OS率(NPSRH组 vs CRH组:90.0% vs 89.9%;P = 0.910)影响不大。单因素分析显示,淋巴管间隙浸润(LVSI)和盆腔淋巴结转移与预后显著相关(P < 0.05)。多因素分析显示,盆腔淋巴结转移是局部晚期宫颈癌5年DFS率(β = 1.31,95%CI:1.01 - 1.68,P = 0.040)及5年OS率(β = 1.30,95%CI:1.01 - 1.67,P = 0.046)的独立预后因素。开放性NPSRH对局部晚期宫颈癌患者可行,可改善短期和长期膀胱功能,且不是患者预后的危险因素。