• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A conceptual framework to address administrative and infection control barriers for animal-assisted intervention programs in healthcare facilities: Perspectives from a qualitative study.

作者信息

Dalton Kathryn R, Campbell Peter, Altekruse William, Thorpe Roland J, Agnew Jacqueline, Ruble Kathy, Carroll Karen C, Davis Meghan F

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;43(4):531-533. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.24. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1017/ice.2021.24
PMID:33487205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7870901/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e7/7870901/ef1671e5953c/S0899823X21000246_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e7/7870901/ef1671e5953c/S0899823X21000246_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e7/7870901/ef1671e5953c/S0899823X21000246_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A conceptual framework to address administrative and infection control barriers for animal-assisted intervention programs in healthcare facilities: Perspectives from a qualitative study.一个解决医疗机构中动物辅助干预项目行政和感染控制障碍的概念框架：来自一项定性研究的观点
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;43(4):531-533. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.24. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Barriers and prospects of India's conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional delivery care: a qualitative analysis of the supply-side perspectives.印度有条件现金转移计划促进机构分娩护理的障碍与前景：基于供方视角的质性分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2849-8.
3
Tuberculosis infection control practices in a high-burden metro in South Africa: A perpetual bane for efficient primary health care service delivery.南非一个高负担城市的结核病感染控制措施：高效提供初级卫生保健服务的长期难题。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 May 30;10(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1628.
4
Guidelines for animal-assisted interventions in health care facilities.医疗机构动物辅助干预指南。
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Mar;36(2):78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.09.005.
5
Understanding healthcare self-referral in Nigeria from the service users' perspective: a qualitative study of Niger state.从服务使用者的角度理解尼日利亚的医疗保健自我转诊：尼日尔州的一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4046-9.
6
Barriers and facilitators to effective tuberculosis infection control practices in Madang Province, PNG - a qualitative study.巴布亚新几内亚马当省有效结核病感染控制措施的障碍与促进因素——一项定性研究
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Aug;18(3):4401. doi: 10.22605/RRH4401. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
7
The role of energy in health facilities: A conceptual framework and complementary data assessment in Malawi.能源在卫生设施中的作用：马拉维的概念框架和补充数据评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 20;13(7):e0200261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200261. eCollection 2018.
8
Evaluating the effects of an intervention to improve the health environment for mothers and children in health centres (BECEYA) in Mali: a qualitative study.评估改善马里卫生中心母婴健康环境的干预措施（BECEYA）的效果：一项定性研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Mar 17;44:138. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.44.138.36736. eCollection 2023.
9
Incentivizing performance in health care: a rapid review, typology and qualitative study of unintended consequences.激励医疗保健绩效：对意外后果的快速审查、分类和定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 23;22(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08032-z.
10
Barriers to managing and delivery of care to war-injured survivors or patients with non-communicable disease: a qualitative study of Palestinian patients' and policy-makers' perspectives.管理和提供战争伤员幸存者或非传染性疾病患者护理方面的障碍：对巴勒斯坦患者和政策制定者观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 11;20(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05302-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions and Practices of Key Worker Stakeholder Groups in Hospital Animal-Assisted Intervention Programs on Occupational Benefits and Perceived Risks.医院动物辅助干预项目中关键工作者利益相关者群体对职业益处和感知风险的认知与实践
People Anim. 2022;5(1).
2
Animal assisted intervention: A systematic review of benefits and risks.动物辅助干预：益处与风险的系统评价
Eur J Integr Med. 2016 Oct;8(5):695-706. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 20.
3
A meta-analysis of Animal Assisted Interventions targeting pain, anxiety and distress in medical settings.
针对医疗环境中疼痛、焦虑和痛苦的动物辅助干预措施的荟萃分析。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;33:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
4
Perceptions of a hospital-based animal assisted intervention program: An exploratory study.对一项基于医院的动物辅助干预项目的认知：一项探索性研究。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016 Nov;25:150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
5
Effectiveness of animal-assisted therapy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.动物辅助疗法的有效性：随机对照试验的系统评价
Complement Ther Med. 2014 Apr;22(2):371-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.12.016. Epub 2014 Jan 6.