Suppr超能文献

治疗晚期下肢缺血的费用。搭桥手术与一期截肢术的比较。

Cost of treating advanced leg ischemia. Bypass graft vs primary amputation.

作者信息

Raviola C A, Nichter L S, Baker J D, Busuttil R W, Machleder H I, Moore W S

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Section, UCLA School of Medicine.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1988 Apr;123(4):495-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400280105021.

Abstract

We compared the hospital costs of 94 patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass grafts with those of 53 patients undergoing primary amputation. The total cost of uncomplicated bypass surgery averaged +20,300, compared with +14,000 for uncomplicated below-knee amputation. However, including the cost of prosthesis and rehabilitation, the total cost of primary amputation was +20,400, equivalent to that of the bypass operation. Complications requiring revision of a bypass graft increased hospitalization by 4.5 days with the total cost rising to +28,700; complications that ended with major amputation added 15 hospitalization days and had an average cost of +42,200. In contrast, complicated below-knee amputation cost +40,600 and added 12.5 hospitalization days. There is therefore no cost-benefit in primary amputation when compared with arterial reconstruction, and cost should not be used to deny a patient the opportunity for limb salvage.

摘要

我们比较了94例行股腘动脉搭桥术患者与53例行一期截肢术患者的住院费用。单纯搭桥手术的总费用平均为20300美元,而单纯膝下截肢术的费用为14000美元。然而,包括假肢和康复费用在内,一期截肢术的总费用为20400美元,与搭桥手术相当。需要翻修搭桥移植物的并发症使住院时间增加4.5天,总费用升至28700美元;以大截肢告终的并发症使住院时间增加15天,平均费用为42200美元。相比之下,复杂的膝下截肢术费用为40600美元,住院时间增加12.5天。因此,与动脉重建相比,一期截肢术没有成本效益,不应因费用问题而剥夺患者肢体挽救的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验