Srivastava Divya, Verma Ruchi, Singh Tapas K, Verma Alka, Chandra Abhilash, Sahu Sandeep, Mishra Prabhakar
Department of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;14(2):233-238. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_45_20. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has provided adequate analgesia and lowered postoperative opioid requirement in comparison to controls for some urological surgeries.
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of postprocedure ultrasound-guided QLB in comparison to port-site infiltrations with local anesthetics (as control) in lowering postoperative pain after laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Fifty-three adults undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty were randomly allocated to either anterior QLB group ( = 27) or port-site infiltration Group P ( = 26) with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. The primary outcomes were static and dynamic pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-100 at the 30 min, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hour after surgery. The secondary outcomes were number of patients requiring rescue analgesics and having postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) in 24 hours after surgery.
Intergroup comparison of VAS was done with Student's -test. Categorical data were analyzed using the Chi-square test.
The static VAS scores were found to be significantly lower in QLB group at the 2, 6, and 12 hour, and the dynamic VAS was lower at all time points after the 30 min in the QLB group. The number of patients requiring rescue analgesics were significantly lower in the QLB group (13 as compared to 21 in Group P; = 0.015). The incidence of PONV was comparable. No other side effects were seen.
Ultrasound-guided anterior QLB is more effective in comparison to traditional technique of port-site local anesthetic infiltration for providing analgesia after laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
与对照组相比,腰方肌阻滞(QLB)已为一些泌尿外科手术提供了充分的镇痛,并降低了术后阿片类药物的需求量。
本研究的目的是评估术后超声引导下QLB与局部麻醉剂端口部位浸润(作为对照)相比,在降低腹腔镜肾盂成形术后疼痛方面的疗效。
这是一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验。
53例接受腹腔镜肾盂成形术的成年人被随机分配至前路QLB组(n = 27)或端口部位浸润P组(n = 26),注射20 mL 0.5%罗哌卡因。主要结局是术后30分钟、2小时、6小时、12小时和24小时时视觉模拟量表(VAS,范围0 - 100)上的静态和动态疼痛。次要结局是术后24小时内需要补救性镇痛以及发生术后恶心或呕吐(PONV)的患者数量。
采用学生t检验进行VAS组间比较。分类数据采用卡方检验进行分析。
发现QLB组在术后2小时、6小时和12小时时静态VAS评分显著更低,且QLB组在30分钟后的所有时间点动态VAS均更低。QLB组需要补救性镇痛的患者数量显著更少(13例,而P组为21例;P = 0.015)。PONV的发生率相当。未观察到其他副作用。
与传统的端口部位局部麻醉浸润技术相比,超声引导下前路QLB在腹腔镜肾盂成形术后提供镇痛方面更有效。